29 Dec '14 19:45>5 edits
People are different. Some have higher sex drives than others. Religion does humanity a disservice by insisting that we all behave as if we are the same.
That was clear enough. No misunderstanding on my part. And I responded.
I responded -
This is a very wide generalization BigDoggProblem.
And it is a bit self refuting one. You are doing much the same thing by insisting everyone agree with your opinion here.
etc. etc.
Oddly, it also promotes an extreme skepticism of the human race. "You cannot be trusted to manage your own sexuality responsibly!"
I don't know who else is being expected to manage your self control besides yourself.
You seem to be implying a kind of anarchy (in a good sense perhaps)? I mean, something suggesting no laws are needed because everyone, left alone, will do just fine.
Did you get your daily newspaper yet?
There was a time in history where pure anarchy without human government was in place. That period ended with the Flood in Noah's time. Before that flood God gave space for EVERYONE to just go by their own conscience.
That was a true totally libertarian society. That was a true anarchy.
It did not end well. It ended in the need for divine judgment.
Sin infested Man mistakes himself for the person he wishes to be.
Fallen Man (from the sin of Adam) too often mistakes himself for what he ought to be. What he knows and what he ends up DOING are not the same because of the sin nature enslaving men.
But I agree that mere OUTWARD coercion of government is not a solution.
But to abolish all laws and jails is not the solution. Everyone WILL NOT, in fact, simply manage themselves.
There is some ground for you to say "Encourage people to manage THEMSELVES." There is some ground for that. But there is no total ground because some will not do so. Harm is inflicted on others. So detention, punishment, reform, imprisonment, and in some cases even death, is needed to control the abuses of those who WILL NOT simply nobly manage themselves.
- it chides. "You might make a hash of it - so the best thing to do is repress your sexuality or at least limit it to a single method of practice that is the least likely to cause harm!"
I am not doubting that many people can find happiness in a committed, monogamous relationship. I know many people who do [or at least, if they are cheating, they have fooled everyone]. But, what a great loss to people who can responsibly enjoy sex outside of marriage that the stony-faced rule-makers feel compelled to take that away from them.
Well, I honestly don't think I misunderstood you in the first place.
I think I got it the first time.