Originally posted by Suzianne These are the worst ideas I've ever heard. But what's bothering me isn't the stupid ideas in your post. It's that so far, 2 people have actually agreed with you.
Maybe they 'got' my post whereas it simply went whoosh over your head.
Originally posted by wolfgang59 Apathist: I want to talk about how to improve our system. What ideas do you have. josephw: Theocracy wolfgang59: Whose - and in what way would it improve the system? josephw: ... Wrong word ..... It wouldn't
What sort of idiot are you?
I was asking for whose theocracy. The theocracy of Ancient Egypt? What?
And in rep ...[text shortened]... uldn't"!
(After replying to a post on how to improve the system!)
You are severely retarded.
I'm retarded? And you can't understand me! That's retarded.
What's your problem? I didn't say anything that should cause you to spew vitriol and call me retarded. You're allowing yourself to come unhinged over a simple statement you're apparently unwilling to comprehend.
It's not a question of "whose" theocracy. A theocracy isn't man made. Otherwise it wouldn't be a theocracy. And a theocracy wouldn't "improve" a man made system of government. It would replace it altogether.
If you don't agree with my rationale, then argue against it. Calling me retarded only makes you look stupid.
Originally posted by josephw It's not a question of "whose" theocracy. A theocracy isn't man made. Otherwise it wouldn't be a theocracy. And a theocracy wouldn't "improve" a man made system of government. It would replace it altogether.
Countries that designate themselves "Islamic States" like Pakistan and Iran are theocracies. Are you really claiming "a theocracy isn't man made"?
Originally posted by josephw I'm retarded? And you can't understand me! That's retarded.
What's your problem? I didn't say anything that should cause you to spew vitriol and call me retarded. You're allowing yourself to come unhinged over a simple statement you're apparently unwilling to comprehend.
It's not a question of "whose" theocracy. A theocracy isn't man made. Otherwise it ...[text shortened]... agree with my rationale, then argue against it. Calling me retarded only makes you look stupid.
I'd say posting "Theocracy" as an improvement then a post later saying it isn't ... retarded.
Where have I said I don't understand you? (You are delusional now)
It is you who is saying you do not understand Sonhouse's post. (Calling it senseless)
And you should not use words you do not understand.
It seems "senseless" and "theocracy" are on that (long) list.
A theocracy is run by the Priests (or whatever the head men want to call themselves)
of a specific religion. That religion could be polytheist. Interested in that?
Originally posted by wolfgang59 I'd say posting "Theocracy" as an improvement then a post later saying it isn't ... retarded.
Where have I said I don't understand you? (You are delusional now)
It is you who is saying you do not understand Sonhouse's post. (Calling it senseless)
And you should not use words you do not understand.
It seems "senseless" and "theocracy" are on that ...[text shortened]... all themselves)
of a specific religion. That religion could be polytheist. Interested in that?
A theocracy wouldn't be an improvement. It'd be the solution.
Originally posted by FMF It would seem you think it went whoosh right over her head, then.
"You don't tug on Supergirl's cape,
You don't spit into the wind,
You don't pull the mask off that ol Lone Ranger,
And you don't mess around with Suzianne!!!
Once knew a Geologist that had majored in Theology...The rumor going around was that when answering the question of his major the interviewer determined that he had a lisp.
25 May '17 06:14
trump
Back to Top