Originally posted by ZygalskiCan it be said then that the only honourable exception in your list is grandmasteryoda?!
When you follow the full methodology both the very best pre-1990 correspondence World Championship finalists & current OTB Super GM's all have match rates around
Top 1 Match 60%
Top 2 Match 75%
Top 3 Match 85%
+/- a % or so for each T%.
No single benchmark has ever been published for an unassisted human player where 20 objectively chosen games yielding 600+ non-theory moves have exceeded all 3 of the above T-figures.
Originally posted by ptriple42No. Most opponents only had 2 games vs BigKat in this list, which means that the matchup is not statistically significant (a descent player can achieve this). In addition, a few other players seem to play below the supposed threshold of this engine matchup. However, it is quite obvious that ~90% of the opponents are suspicious, and to sum this up: It is a shame.
Can it be said then that the only honourable exception in your list is grandmasteryoda?!
Originally posted by Zygalski
[b]All database moves were excluded from analysis.
Game 9176861
{ White: kes29 }
{ Top 1 Match: 29/35 ( 82.9% )
{ Top 2 Match: 32/35 ( 91.4% )
{ Top 3 Match: 32/35 ( 91.4% )
{ Top 4 Match: 33/35 ( 94.3% )
{ Black: TheBigKat }
{ Top 1 Match: 24/34 ( 70.6% )
{ Top 2 Match: 29/34 ( 85.3% )
{ Top 3 Match: 30/34 ( 88.2% )
{ Top 4 Match: 33/34 ( ...[text shortened]... d be interesting to check if this is just a one-of mistake, and not some kind of systematic failure?
OK, here's the second part of the post above:
This game has 44 moves; you analysed 35, so your database has only the first 9. However, the www.365chess.com database, for instance, contains 3 games after 14 moves. Actually, the game followed a book until around move 19-20 (I cannot confirm for sure as I don't have it any more). Could you do the analysis of my games, it would be interesting to check if this is just a one-of mistake, and not some kind of systematic failure?
Originally posted by kes29I can find Galliamova-Danielian 2000 which deviated from your game on 12...Nc5
OK, here's the second part of the post above:
This game has 44 moves; you analysed 35, so your database has only the first 9. However, the www.365chess.com database, for instance, contains 3 games after 14 moves. Actually, the game followed a book until around move 19-20 (I cannot confirm for sure as I don't have it any more). Could you do the analysis of m ...[text shortened]... interesting to check if this is just a one-of mistake, and not some kind of systematic failure?
This only means a couple of extra moves were analysed for both players & certainly won't effect the over all match rate %'s significantly with 745 analysed moves.
So no, not a systematic failure as you rather dramatically put it.
Here is the ply-by-ply for that game.
[Event "Longhaul Banded Octet"]
[Site "http://www.playtheimmortalgame.com"]
[Date "2012.03.28"]
[EndDate "2014.02.07"]
[Round "1"]
[White "kes29"]
[Black "TheBigKat"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[WhiteElo "2174"]
[BlackElo "2459"]
[GameID "9176861"]
[Analysis "Houdini 1.03a x64 4_CPU Hash:512 Time:30s Depth:12-20ply"]
{ Book Moves: }
1. d4 d5 2. c4 dxc4 3. e3 Nf6 4. Bxc4 e6 5. Nf3 c5 6. 0-0 a6 7. Bb3 b5 8. a4 b4
9. e4 cxd4
{ Analyzed: }
10. Nbd2 { e5 -1 19 : Nbd2 -7 19 : Re1 -14 19 : Nxd4 -28 19 }
10... Nc6 { Bb7 0 20 : Nc6 1 20 : Bc5 8 20 : Be7 8 20 }
11. e5 { e5 0 20 : Re1 -12 20 : a5 -26 20 : Ba2 -30 20 }
11... Nd7 { Nd7 0 18 : Nd5 14 18 : Ng4 46 18 : Ng8 58 18 }
12. Nc4 { Nc4 0 19 : Ne4 -16 19 : Re1 -31 18 : a5 -47 18 }
12... Be7 { Bb7 0 19 : Be7 16 19 : Bc5 19 19 : Nc5 8 18 }
13. Nxd4 { Nxd4 15 19 : Nd6+ 11 18 : Bf4 0 18 : Bc2 -11 18 }
13... Ndxe5 { Ndxe5 18 20 : Ncxe5 34 19 : Nxd4 50 19 : Bb7 59 19 }
14. Nxc6 { Nxc6 10 20 : Nxe5 -41 20 : Be3 -44 19 : Bf4 -54 19 }
14... Nxc6 { Nxc6 13 19 : Qxd1 45 19 : Qc7 894 19 : Qd7 958 18 }
15. Qf3 { Bf4 11 20 : Qf3 8 20 : Be3 0 20 : Qg4 0 20 }
15... Nd4 { Nd4 19 20 : Qd5 35 20 : Bd7 41 20 : Bb7 55 20 }
16. Qxa8 { Qxa8 19 20 : Qd1 -73 20 : Qd3 -92 20 : Qe3 -116 20 }
16... Nxb3 { Nxb3 18 19 : 0-0 254 19 : Qc7 412 19 : Bd7 527 19 }
17. Nb6 { Nb6 18 20 : Rb1 0 20 : Ra2 -11 20 : Bg5 -14 20 }
17... Nxa1 { Nxa1 18 20 : 0-0 21 20 : Bf6 41 20 : Qxb6 47 20 }
18. Nxc8 { Nxc8 17 20 : Be3 -58 20 : Qxc8 -81 20 : Qc6+ -92 20 }
18... Nb3 { Nb3 16 20 : 0-0 20 19 : Bf6 79 19 : f6 88 19 }
19. Be3 { Be3 16 20 : Bf4 15 20 : Qxa6 6 20 : Qc6+ 6 20 }
19... 0-0 { 0-0 16 18 : Bf6 269 18 : Qd5 214 17 : Kf8 240 17 }
20. Nxe7+ { Nxe7+ 17 20 : Qa7 -92 20 : Qb7 -157 20 : Qxa6 -335 20 }
20... Qxe7 { Qxe7 24 20 : Kh8 283 20 }
21. Qxa6 { Qxa6 18 20 : Qc6 -7 20 : Qe4 -52 20 : Qf3 -52 20 }
21... Qd7 { Qd7 13 20 : Qd8 26 20 : Rd8 26 20 : h6 52 20 }
22. Qb5 { Qb5 13 20 : h3 9 20 : Re1 8 20 : Rb1 8 20 }
22... Qxb5 { Qd6 20 20 : Qxb5 20 20 : Qd5 50 20 : Rd8 59 20 }
23. axb5 { axb5 19 17 : h4 -1349 17 : Ra1 -1279 16 : Rd1 -1301 16 }
23... Rb8 { Rb8 14 20 : Rd8 25 20 : f5 43 20 : Rc8 66 20 }
24. b6 { b6 12 20 : Rd1 4 20 : f4 -38 20 : f3 -40 20 }
24... Kf8 { Kf8 11 20 : Rb7 42 20 : f5 45 20 : g5 63 20 }
25. Rd1 { f4 11 20 : f3 10 20 : Re1 10 20 : g4 10 20 }
25... Ke7 { Ke7 7 20 : Ke8 7 20 : Rb7 41 20 : Na5 57 20 }
26. Kf1 { Kf1 7 20 : g4 4 20 : g3 3 20 : f4 1 20 }
26... Rd8 { Rd8 7 20 : Rb7 34 20 : Ke8 34 20 : g6 35 20 }
27. Rxd8 { Rxd8 7 20 : Re1 0 20 : Ke2 0 20 : Ke1 0 20 }
27... Kxd8 { Kxd8 7 19 : Na5 1178 19 : Nc5 1614 19 : h6 #21 19 }
28. Ke2 { Ke2 6 20 : f4 3 20 : f3 3 20 : Ke1 1 20 }
28... Na5 { Kc8 6 20 : Na5 6 20 : Kd7 9 20 : Na1 20 20 }
29. Bc5 { Bd4 6 20 : Bc5 6 20 : Kd3 6 20 : Bd2 5 20 }
29... Kc8 { Kd7 10 20 : Nc6 13 20 : Kc8 13 20 : b3 15 20 }
30. Kd3 { Kd3 13 20 : f4 12 20 : h4 5 20 : Bf8 5 20 }
30... Nc6 { Nc6 12 20 : Kb7 12 20 : b3 17 20 : g6 27 20 }
31. Kc4 { Kc4 12 20 : f4 12 20 : h4 6 20 : f3 5 20 }
31... Kb7 { Kb7 13 20 : g5 24 20 : g6 26 20 : Ne5+ 26 20 }
32. b3 { f4 13 20 : Kb5 9 20 : Bxb4 6 20 : b3 6 20 }
32... g5 { g5 10 20 : Ka6 15 20 : h5 15 20 : g6 15 20 }
33. Kb5 { Kb5 12 20 : Be3 12 20 : f3 12 20 : h3 11 20 }
33... Ne5 { g4 14 20 : h5 18 20 : h6 19 20 : f6 19 20 }
34. Kxb4 { Kxb4 27 20 : Be3 21 20 : h3 17 20 : Bxb4 14 20 }
34... Nd3+ { f5 28 20 : Nc6+ 29 20 : Kc6 30 20 : Nd3+ 31 20 }
35. Kb5 { Kb5 31 20 : Kc4 20 20 : Kc3 -369 20 : Ka5 -445 20 }
35... Ne1 { f5 27 20 : Nf4 29 20 : g4 30 20 : Ne1 33 20 }
36. Be3 { Be3 29 20 : g3 28 20 : Be7 17 20 : g4 2 20 }
36... f6 { g4 31 20 : Nxg2 32 20 : h6 43 20 : f6 50 20 }
37. g3 { g3 59 20 : Bd4 11 20 : g4 10 20 : Kc5 3 20 }
37... Nf3 { Nf3 36 20 : h5 36 20 : Nd3 108 20 : e5 115 20 }
38. h3 { h3 36 20 : Kc5 0 20 : Bc5 -12 20 : Kc4 -40 20 }
38... h5 { h5 35 20 : Ng1 35 20 : Ne5 119 20 : e5 123 20 }
39. Kc5 { Kc5 35 20 : Bc5 8 20 : Kc4 0 20 : b4 0 20 }
39... Ng1 { Ng1 35 20 : e5 157 20 : f5 157 20 : h4 186 20 }
40. Kd6 { Kd6 35 20 : h4 2 20 : f4 0 20 : b4 0 20 }
40... Nxh3 { Nxh3 35 20 : h4 191 20 : e5 411 20 : f5 427 19 }
41. Kxe6 { Kxe6 28 20 : Ke7 0 20 : Kd7 0 20 : b4 0 20 }
41... Ng1 { Ng1 27 20 : h4 200 20 : Kc6 546 20 : Kb8 546 20 }
42. Kf5 { Kf5 28 20 : Kxf6 2 20 : Bc5 2 20 : Ke7 2 20 }
42... Ka6 { Kc6 30 20 : Ka6 30 20 : Ne2 37 20 : Kc8 53 20 }
43. Bd4 { b4 29 20 : Bc5 26 20 : f4 20 20 : Ke4 12 20 }
43... h4 { h4 2 20 : Nf3 166 20 : Ne2 337 20 : Kb7 421 20 }
44. gxh4 { gxh4 2 20 : b7 0 20 : f4 -287 20 : f3 -784 20 }
1/2-1/2
{ Game Summary }
{ White: kes29 }
{ Top 1 Match: 29/35 ( 82.9% )
{ Top 2 Match: 32/35 ( 91.4% )
{ Top 3 Match: 32/35 ( 91.4% )
{ Top 4 Match: 33/35 ( 94.3% )
{ Black: TheBigKat }
{ Top 1 Match: 24/34 ( 70.6% )
{ Top 2 Match: 29/34 ( 85.3% )
{ Top 3 Match: 30/34 ( 88.2% )
{ Top 4 Match: 33/34 ( 97.1% )
So if you exclude the moves which I can find in Galliamova-Danielian, you end up with the following match rates for that game:
{ White: kes29 }
{ Top 1 Match: 27/32 ( 84.4% )
{ Top 2 Match: 29/32 ( 90.6% )
{ Top 3 Match: 29/32 ( 90.6% )
{ Top 4 Match: 30/32 ( 93.8% )
{ Black: TheBigKat }
{ Top 1 Match: 23/32 ( 71.9% )
{ Top 2 Match: 27/32 ( 84.4% )
{ Top 3 Match: 28/32 ( 87.5% )
{ Top 4 Match: 31/32 ( 96.9% )
Barely any difference, is there?
According to the http://www.365chess.com/ database, there are 3 games containing the position after Move 14 from the Game 9176861:
Krivoshey (2533) vs. Zambrana (2409) Las Palmas 2005
Leitao (2575) vs. Zambrana (2425) Santos 2006
Leitao (2598) vs. Llapasset (2131) Figueres 2006
(And as I mentioned an opening book contains even more).
I checked the other 19 analysed games with that database. Here is a brief summary (hopefully I haven't done too many mistakes):
# 5 games are OK
# 5 games have small mismatch (one or 1/2 of the move)
# 6 games - average (1.5 to 4 moves)
# 4 games - 5 or more moves (Game 10374688 is the worst in this regard with 7 move mismatch)
# Overall 43/41 move difference for white/black out of the 745/739 analysed moves
So ~5.5% of the analysed moves can actually be found in this free online database alone. Hopefully you are more diligent with other aspects of the model... (Although no doubt the rates would remain very high even after removing them from analysis).
Although you can find a few moves that were analysed that may be in a megabase (the Batch Analyzer database is automated) it doesn't really change the over all %'s much, as I showed in your game. That's why longer games are selected for analysis - a bigger sample size helps to smooth-out these problems.
Anyway, congratulations on your draw against the #1 player on this site in that incredibly accurate game 🙂
Well the program is called Batch Analyzer for a reason. This type of analysis is only useful for samples of 20+ games. You can't really learn much from a single game because there can be plenty of obvious/forcing moves which could skew the %s in a big way.
[Event "Siege"]
[Site "http://www.redhotpawn.com"]
[Date "2011.08.29"]
[EndDate "2012.05.08"]
[Round "?"]
[White "tappa"]
[Black "KnightStalker47"]
[Result "0-1"]
[WhiteElo "2299"]
[BlackElo "1940"]
[GameID "8668504"]
[Analysis "Houdini 1.03a x64 4_CPU Hash:512 Time:30s Depth:12-20ply"]
{ Book Moves: }
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. Nc3 Bb4 5. Bg5 Bb7 6. e3 h6 7. Bxf6 Qxf6 8. Bd3
{ Analyzed: }
8... Bxc3+ { c5 -20 19 : 0-0 -7 19 : Bxc3+ -7 19 : Bxf3 -7 19 }
9. bxc3 { bxc3 -7 20 : Kf1 -450 20 : Ke2 -460 20 : Nd2 -468 20 }
9... d6 { c5 -7 20 : Bxf3 -5 20 : 0-0 -3 20 : a5 -4 19 }
10. 0-0 { Rb1 -4 19 : Qc2 -5 19 : 0-0 -5 19 : a4 -6 19 }
10... 0-0 { 0-0 -5 20 : Nd7 -1 20 : Bxf3 0 20 : Qe7 0 19 }
11. Nd2 { Nd2 -4 20 : Rb1 -5 19 : Rc1 -8 19 : Qe2 -9 19 }
11... Qe7 { Nd7 -3 19 : Qg5 -1 19 : c5 0 19 : Qe7 0 18 }
12. Qh5 { Qc2 -2 19 : a4 -2 18 : Bc2 -4 18 : Qe2 -4 18 }
12... Nd7 { Nd7 -5 19 : Re8 -2 19 : a5 -2 19 : a6 -1 19 }
13. Rfb1 { Rfe1 -5 18 : a4 -7 18 : Qe2 -8 18 : Qg4 -9 17 }
13... f5 { f5 -12 19 : Qe8 -9 19 : Nf6 -5 19 : Rfe8 -8 18 }
14. e4 { Re1 -11 19 : Rf1 -15 19 : Bc2 -13 18 : f3 -15 18 }
14... Nf6 { f4 -12 20 : Rae8 -6 20 : fxe4 -5 20 : Nf6 -5 20 }
15. Qg6 { Qe2 -12 20 : Qg6 -13 20 : Qh4 -16 20 : Qh3 -75 19 }
15... fxe4 { Bxe4 -10 20 : Nxe4 -10 20 : fxe4 -10 20 : Ng4 -4 20 }
16. Nxe4 { Nxe4 -11 19 : Bxe4 -21 19 : Bc2 -72 19 : Be2 -82 19 }
16... Nxe4 { Nxe4 -13 20 : Bxe4 -12 20 : Qf7 0 20 : Rae8 2 20 }
17. Bxe4 { Bxe4 -13 18 : f3 -467 18 : Rf1 -407 17 : Rb2 -417 17 }
17... Bxe4 { Bxe4 -12 20 : Rf5 349 20 : Rfb8 396 20 : d5 385 19 }
18. Qxe4 { Qxe4 -13 18 : Qg4 -702 18 : Qh5 -733 18 : Qg3 -724 17 }
18... Qf6 { Rae8 -13 20 : e5 -13 20 : Qf7 -6 20 : Qf6 -3 20 }
19. Rb2 { Rf1 -2 20 : f3 -9 20 : Rb2 -15 20 : Qe3 -23 20 }
19... Rae8 { e5 -15 20 : Rae8 -8 20 : Qf5 -6 20 : c5 -3 20 }
20. Qb7 { Qc6 -8 20 : Re1 -8 20 : Re2 -18 20 : a4 -26 20 }
20... e5 { e5 -30 20 : Re7 -17 19 : Qf7 -12 19 : Rf7 0 19 }
21. d5 { Qd5+ -36 20 : h3 -42 20 : Rab1 -37 19 : Rf1 -48 19 }
21... e4 { e4 -195 20 : Re7 -48 19 : Rf7 -43 19 : Qf7 -26 19 }
22. Qxc7 { Re2 -206 19 : Re1 -209 19 : Rd1 -236 19 : Rf1 -242 19 }
22... Qxc3 { Qxc3 -337 19 : Re7 -217 18 : e3 -145 18 : Rf7 -19 18 }
23. Rbb1 { Rbb1 -337 19 : Qxg7+ -1659 19 : Rf1 -1852 19 : Qxd6 -1672 18 }
23... Rxf2 { Rxf2 -351 19 : Qd4 -310 18 : Qd2 -152 18 : Qe5 -107 18 }
24. Kxf2 { Qd7 -346 17 : Kh1 -546 17 : Qc6 -718 17 : Rd1 -726 17 }
24... e3+ { Qd4+ -1140 18 : e3+ 0 18 : Qe5 385 18 : Kh7 366 17 }
25. Kg1 { Kg1 0 9 : Kg3 -#12 9 : Kf3 -#12 9 : Kf1 -#12 9 }
25... e2 { e2 0 19 : Qd4 345 19 : Kh7 372 19 : Kh8 460 19 }
26. Rf1 { h3 0 19 : g3 0 19 : h4 -78 19 : g4 -878 19 }
26... Qd4+ { exf1=Q+ -1022 20 : Qd4+ -1016 20 : Qe3+ -1016 20 : exf1=R+ -1016 20 }
27. Kh1 { Kh1 -1022 4 : Rf2 -#2 3 }
27... Qxa1 { exf1=Q+ -1059 20 : exf1=R+ -1057 20 : exf1=N -1050 20 : exf1=B -1047 20 }
28. Qf7+ { Qf7+ -30 4 : Qxg7+ -#5 3 : h4 -#4 3 : h3 -#3 3 }
28... Kh7 { Kh7 -50 17 : Kh8 #8 17 }
29. Rxa1 { Rxa1 -50 6 : Qf5+ -191 6 : Kg1 -1775 6 : h4 -#8 6 }
29... e1=R+ { e1=R+ -52 19 : e1=Q+ -47 19 : Ra8 1320 19 : Re5 1317 18 }
30. Qf1 { Qf1 -48 4 : Rxe1 -#2 3 }
30... Rxf1+ { Rxf1+ -67 20 : R1e5 581 20 : R1e7 587 20 : R1e4 595 20 }
31. Rxf1 { Rxf1 -43 20 }
31... Re2 { Re4 -53 20 : Re2 -48 20 : Rc8 -30 20 : Kg6 -29 20 }
32. g3 { a3 -41 20 : h3 -42 20 : Kg1 -79 20 : h4 -85 20 }
32... Kg6 { Rxa2 -89 20 : Kg8 -41 20 : Rc2 -30 20 : h5 -28 20 }
33. Rf8 { Rf8 -25 20 : a3 -39 20 : Ra1 -59 20 : a4 -77 20 }
33... Rxa2 { Rxa2 -26 20 : Rc2 -22 20 : Re4 -18 20 : Re1+ -17 20 }
34. Rd8 { Rd8 -27 20 : h4 -94 20 : Kg1 -96 20 : h3 -115 20 }
34... Kf7 { Kf6 -38 20 : Rc2 -26 20 : Kf5 -26 20 : Rb2 -26 20 }
35. Rxd6 { Rxd6 -6 20 : Rd7+ -41 20 : Kg1 -89 20 : h4 -95 20 }
35... Ra4 { Ke7 -7 20 : Ke8 -7 20 : Re2 -5 20 : Kf8 -4 20 }
36. Rc6 { Rc6 -1 20 : Rd7+ -2 20 : Kg1 -13 20 : Kg2 -19 20 }
36... a5 { a5 0 20 : Ra2 0 20 : Rb4 0 20 : Ke7 0 20 }
37. Kg2 { Kg2 0 20 : Rc7+ 0 20 : Kg1 -1 20 : Rxb6 -18 20 }
37... Rb4 { Rb4 0 20 : Ke7 0 20 : h5 0 20 : Ke8 0 20 }
38. Kf3 { Rc7+ 0 20 : Kf3 0 20 : Kf2 -2 20 : Kf1 -21 20 }
38... a4 { Ke7 -4 20 : h5 -2 20 : a4 -2 20 : Ke8 0 20 }
39. Ke3 { Rc7+ -1 20 : Ke3 -1 20 : Rc8 -7 20 : g4 -19 20 }
39... a3 { h5 0 20 : Rb3+ 0 20 : Ke8 0 20 : Ke7 0 20 }
40. Rc7+ { Rc7+ 0 18 : c5 -536 18 : d6 -626 18 : Kd3 -650 17 }
40... Kf6 { Kf6 0 20 : Kg6 5 20 : Ke8 9 20 : Kf8 11 20 }
41. Ra7 { Ra7 0 20 : Rc6+ -93 20 : Rc8 -159 19 : c5 -346 19 }
41... Rxc4 { Rb3+ 0 20 : Rxc4 0 20 : Ke5 0 20 : b5 0 20 }
42. Rxa3 { Rxa3 0 20 : Kd3 -25 20 : d6 -26 20 : Ra6 -27 20 }
42... b5 { Ke5 0 20 : b5 0 20 : Rc2 0 20 : Rc1 2 20 }
43. d6 { Ra7 0 20 : Ra6+ 0 20 : d6 0 20 : Ra5 -4 20 }
43... Ke6 { Ke6 0 20 : Rc8 0 20 : Rc1 0 20 : Rc6 0 20 }
44. Rd3 { Ra7 0 20 : Ra5 -7 20 : Ra6 -14 20 : Rb3 -20 20 }
44... Kd7 { Kd7 -20 20 : Rc8 0 20 : Rc3 908 20 : Ra4 923 20 }
45. Rd5 { Rb3 -20 20 : Rd2 -20 20 : Rd5 -21 20 : Rd1 -21 20 }
45... b4 { b4 -21 20 : Rb4 -20 20 : Rc3+ 0 20 : Rc6 0 20 }
0-1
{ Game Summary }
{ White: tappa }
{ Top 1 Match: 20/37 ( 54.1% )
{ Top 2 Match: 23/37 ( 62.2% )
{ Top 3 Match: 27/37 ( 73.0% )
{ Top 4 Match: 27/37 ( 73.0% )
{ Black: KnightStalker47 }
{ Top 1 Match: 20/38 ( 52.6% )
{ Top 2 Match: 26/38 ( 68.4% )
{ Top 3 Match: 29/38 ( 76.3% )
{ Top 4 Match: 32/38 ( 84.2% )
- Joined
- 12 Nov 06
- Moves
- 74414
Originally posted by Data FlyThanks for the analysis, nice to see my sacrifice was sound, even though the follow up was a little sloppy. I see now I missed 27. exf1=Q Rxf1 28. Qf2!! That would have been a great way to end the game!
I don't understand why White resigned at the end.
I find it strange your engine preferred 29. e1=R+ over 29. e1=Q+. It even gave the two moves different evaluations 🙄.
He sent me this message at the end of the game.
"I think you have the edge on this one. I am cutting back on siege matches, so please have the other one on me as well. All the best - tappa"
43 out of 745 is more than a few, especially as you proclaimed that "All database moves were excluded from analysis".
As for my game vs. TheBigKat - it left an opening book at around move 20, however your analysis included moves 10 to 20 that were all marked as top choices except one or two marked as second choices. That's ~30% of the total analysed moves, is that really not significant? The remaining 24 moves included a few early piece exchanges, then the White King's journey to win the Black's queenside pawn (the only obvious way trying to win), then more or less forced responses to the Knight's moves in moves 33 - 38, and finally the the White King's moves to take the Black's kingside pawns - again the only obvious plan. But of course, all this analysis requires some work, it's so much easier to simply drop a random sarcastic congratulatory post.