1. santa cruz, ca.
    Joined
    19 Jul '13
    Moves
    376505
    19 Apr '17 04:20
    Originally posted by mghrn55
    That is false !!!!
    You haven't been paying attention.

    A lot of people wanted punishment for the indiscretions of 2016.
    But they were backed into a corner of selecting the only option that provided for the punishment.
    Option 3 had considerable support !!

    And you are making this about Metallica again !!
    I'm using Metallica in a generic way and I stand by my observation about the vote
  2. Here
    Joined
    31 May '06
    Moves
    416756
    19 Apr '17 08:04
    The whole voting process is a complete sham
    I think it was designed to make ELO the vote winner
    it didn't work
    There should be an option to punish on all the proposals
    Or a vote on punish or not and then a vote on the new or not system
  3. Joined
    16 Feb '08
    Moves
    116923
    19 Apr '17 08:50
    Originally posted by padger
    The whole voting process is a complete sham
    I think it was designed to make ELO the vote winner
    it didn't work
    There should be an option to punish on all the proposals
    Or a vote on punish or not and then a vote on the new or not system
    It seems to me that people are more interested in punishment rather than reform.
  4. Subscriberroma45
    st johnstone
    Joined
    14 Nov '09
    Moves
    417289
    19 Apr '17 10:47
    Originally posted by divegeester
    It seems to me that people are more interested in punishment rather than reform.
    No system will work unless a statement is made against those who cheat
    Points have been removed in the past and clans suspended this should have been done ages ago without the need for a vote
    If the punishment is severe and warning issued to every clan leader that future cheating will result in a ban then it will stop

    No amnesty
  5. Subscribershortcircuit
    master of disaster
    funny farm
    Joined
    28 Jan '07
    Moves
    101446
    19 Apr '17 12:51
    Originally posted by lemondrop
    those who voted for punishment also want to keep the same scoring system
    you think Metallica wants to change the scoring
    I don't think so
    Too bad that you didn't read my explanation of my vote BEFORE anyone started with comments like this.
    Before you were here, there have been 3 different modifications to determining the winners.
    These changes were made in an attempt to thwart Metallica.
    We have rolled with the punches on each one.
    As long as the changes are EQUALLY administered to ALL clans, we will adapt to the
    changes and be competitive.

    Originally is was gross points wins.
    Then they changed it to net points wins.
    Then they changed it to limit number of concurrent challenges against any particular clan to 3 from infinite.
    Then they changed how often you could even challenge a particular clan from infinite
    to once a week.

    However, the ELO clan experiment was clearly not going to work....for anyone.

    Your statement shows the same Metallica animus of several out there who don't like the fact
    that we work hard to accomplish what we have, and because they are unwilling to work
    that hard, they seek to penalize us in an attempt to "level the field"
    I am telling you here and now....I don't care what system they use as long as it is legitimate
    and "Level for ALL clans"....not "All clans EXCEPT Metallica".
  6. Joined
    17 Jun '08
    Moves
    179883
    19 Apr '17 13:14
    Metallica's method of play is clever and successful

    it would change for the better if every game in a challenge counts

    there'd be no incentive to resign early, and no artificial rating drop

    this is equitable, playable, and good for all clans
  7. Joined
    07 Feb '09
    Moves
    151917
    19 Apr '17 15:36
    Originally posted by Giannotti
    Metallica's method of play is clever and successful

    it would change for the better if every game in a challenge counts

    there'd be no incentive to resign early, and no artificial rating drop

    this is equitable, playable, and good for all clans
    I have submitted a proposal to ensure that every game counts.
  8. santa cruz, ca.
    Joined
    19 Jul '13
    Moves
    376505
    19 Apr '17 16:13
    Originally posted by Giannotti
    Metallica's method of play is clever and successful

    it would change for the better if every game in a challenge counts

    there'd be no incentive to resign early, and no artificial rating drop

    this is equitable, playable, and good for all clans
    let's be honest
    what you call clever
    I call predatory
    there success was built on the ignorance and outright stupidity of so many clan leaders
    I will give Metallica credit for their ability to find and exploit these weak leaders
  9. Joined
    07 Feb '09
    Moves
    151917
    19 Apr '17 16:35
    Originally posted by lemondrop
    let's be honest
    what you call clever
    I call predatory
    there success was built on the ignorance and outright stupidity of so many clan leaders
    I will give Metallica credit for their ability to find and exploit these weak leaders
    That's funny !! Weak leaders ??
    You mean the 3 clans on the last page of the clan table in 2016 and 2017 ?
    You mean those weak leaders ??😀
  10. Joined
    17 Jun '08
    Moves
    179883
    19 Apr '17 16:37
    call it predatory if you like
    they're in it to win and their strategy works best under the current system

    almost too well...
    i've had difficulty getting, what i feel to be, an equal challenge
    it's tricky to do so when their ratings don't reflect their actual ability

    if mghrn55's suggestion or mine is adopted
    i'll wait until i see their ratings hit their natural level
    then i look forward to playing them again
    i'll be able to challenge them with confidence
  11. Joined
    16 Feb '08
    Moves
    116923
    19 Apr '17 17:09
    Originally posted by Giannotti
    ...it would change for the better if every game in a challenge counts...
    This seems to be a reasonable suggestion.
  12. Subscribershortcircuit
    master of disaster
    funny farm
    Joined
    28 Jan '07
    Moves
    101446
    20 Apr '17 04:29
    Originally posted by lemondrop
    let's be honest
    what you call clever
    I call predatory
    there success was built on the ignorance and outright stupidity of so many clan leaders
    I will give Metallica credit for their ability to find and exploit these weak leaders
    Oh please!!! We play more challenges than any other clan. We don't run from any clan.
    All clans cannot say that. You indicated you always want an advantage in any challenge
    you accept. You are like robbie in that respect because you won't accept a fair or a
    disadvantaged challenge. I have accepted many disadvantaged challenges. Some
    leaders have the audacity to think they deserve the advantage every time. I have
    posted dead even challenges to robbie and he runs like a girl form them.
    Our success was built on determination and playing the game with a bit of tactics
    sprinkled in for good measure.

    One thing you have NEVER seen Metallica do is engaging in collusion with other
    clans in order to gain points. There are a number of clans (besides robbie and the three sisters)
    who have been benefactors of hand me down points from the sisters. Several of them
    are currently in the top 10 clans too.
    Metallica has not played a challenge against these clans.
    ALL of our points were earned legitimately.

    Too bad you can't say the same..........
  13. Subscriberroma45
    st johnstone
    Joined
    14 Nov '09
    Moves
    417289
    20 Apr '17 09:10
    Since the vote is over
    When will we finally see some action?
  14. santa cruz, ca.
    Joined
    19 Jul '13
    Moves
    376505
    20 Apr '17 23:32
    Originally posted by shortcircuit
    Oh please!!! We play more challenges than any other clan. We don't run from any clan.
    All clans cannot say that. You indicated you always want an advantage in any challenge
    you accept. You are like robbie in that respect because you won't accept a fair or a
    disadvantaged challenge. I have accepted many disadvantaged challenges. Some
    leaders have th ...[text shortened]... clans.
    ALL of our points were earned legitimately.

    Too bad you can't say the same..........
    there are things in this world you will never understand
    you are not a straight shooter no matter what you claim
    more power to you
    either you are a genius with no peers or the other leaders are just plain stupid
  15. Joined
    17 Jun '08
    Moves
    179883
    20 Apr '17 23:33
    action is called for, and i have confidence in Russ

    i'm hoping for a simple point rollback to address collusion
    they're not bad guys, i think they were just making a point

    after the correction...
    RHP needs to take a fresh look at clan play and how it is scored

    with their help, we'll get this all sorted out
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree