Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Ok great I think its a fine and valid proposal. but eight is too small, you should not be allowed to arbitrarily throw games because the entire point of a performance based system is to prevent such abuses. If you are going to throw games you must be made to suffer for it. Furthermore you might find that the margins are so small between clans that it becomes something of a lottery.
A new K value can be arrived at.
One that meets with general approval.
As to the other issue.
In clan challenges, there are 2 competitions at play here.
1 - individual games on the chess board.
2- the clan challenge.
The objective of the challenge is to win the challenge.
Once the challenge is decided, the games tend to become less meaningful.
Perhaps a suggestion in this regard is that once a challenge is won by one clan, the points can be rewarded to the winning clan while the games can continue.
Challenges that look like they end in a tie must be played out to completion.
This suggestion would only apply if the current scoring system stays in place.
Which looks unlikely at the moment.
But it would have worked.
And it would have solved game dumping.