@savedbygrace saidYour journey to the dark side is almost complete.
Tell us again about how you were “standing strong” in your atheism when you refused to pray for a dying relative, you narcissistic, navel-gazing prick.
@fmf saidRuss,
Take a look at @reservation247 who isn't able to disguise the fact he was the racist/Islamophobic Executioner Brand who was banned earlier this year. And take a look at @savedbygrace who also isn't able to disguise the fact he was Romans1009, VLP1083 and PB1022 [yes, banned three times] and has returned and is fixated in exactly the same way as before.
Thanks for your swift action over "Romans1009".
Just "Executioner Brand" remaining on the list of returning banned users, then.
- Joined
- 06 May 15
- Moves
- 27445
@fmf saidWhy does "Romans1009" keep getting banned, and not @divegeester (for instance)?
Russ,
Thanks for your swift action over "Romans1009".
Just "Executioner Brand" remaining on the list of returning banned users, then.
The boundaries are not clear. What's the difference?
@FMF: Even though it was your post I quoted, please don't feel obliged to reply if someone else could provide a better explanation.
- Joined
- 06 May 15
- Moves
- 27445
@divegeester saidThank you for your Christian example.
Your journey to the dark side is almost complete.
- Joined
- 06 May 15
- Moves
- 27445
23 Aug 22
@divegeester saidSpeaking of which, why haven't you been banned permanently?
On a side note; Very Rusty has for years referred to non subscribing complainants, such as vivify here, as “non sub scum”.
This is a phrase which should be banned here at RHP.
23 Aug 22
@Kevin-Eleven
“Why is there a space between Lyons and Spakowski?”
“… open your eyes, look around sometimes”
23 Aug 22
@kevin-eleven saidIn life most boundaries aren’t clear, especially these days; this is why principles, integrity and a reliable moral compass are essential.
The boundaries are not clear.
23 Aug 22
@kevin-eleven saidIt wasn’t a “dodge”, just a little bit oblique.
@divegeester
Whatever, dodge-geester.
@kevin-eleven saidBecause Romans is an arse and that Divegeester is just very, very old and grumpy.
Why does "Romans1009" keep getting banned, and not @divegeester (for instance)?
The boundaries are not clear. What's the difference?
@FMF: Even though it was your post I quoted, please don't feel obliged to reply if someone else could provide a better explanation.
Romans is horrible.
Dive, when push comes to shove, is actually quite acceptable as an old human being.
@Dive: 😜
@fmf saidOf course he has, he hates the site.
It would appear that Romans1009 / PB1022 / SavedByGrace, despite being deleted and undertaking to Russ that he would not return, has nevertheless returned less than 24 hours later.
For reference: @PBSandwich
@shavixmir saidAgreed. The General Forum would wither away and die if it were to become a divegeesterless wasteland.
Dive, when push comes to shove, is actually quite acceptable as an old human being.