02 May 16
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeHaha, I don't think so, I came and I have successfully defended the indefensible, sonhouse, deep thought have fallen into fiction, you have no answers to anything other than to reiterate that dasa deserved his ban and seem content to produce insipid bumber sticker sayings while I am counting Lincolns and sitting in a corner of my room!
Robbie's on the ropes!
02 May 16
Originally posted by twhiteheadThe point is and i don't know how it has evaded you was that it was all in dasa's head.
Actually, although you tried very hard to suggest a dispute, nobody actually did dispute his capacity to carry out the atrocities he desired, so to call it 'in dispute' seems a little strange given that it was all in your head.
As for his capacity to incite others that was disputed and you in no way established that he had no such capacity.
In fact, you ...[text shortened]... problem with 'thought police' and why you attempted to police my thoughts earlier in the thread.
02 May 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieBy room you mean cell right? (You've been disputing yourself for the last 3 pages!)
Haha, I don't think so, I came and I have successfully defended the indefensible, sonhouse, deep thought have fallen into fiction, you have no answers to anything other than to reiterate that dasa deserved his ban and seem content to produce insipid bumber sticker sayings while I am counting Lincolns and sitting in a corner of my room!
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeYou may mock but the time will come when you need Weasel legal services inc. to get you out of a tight spot! 😵 We defend genocidal maniacs, and psycho killers, quacks of all kinds. Clients include Anders Breivik (he hired us to get him decent playstation games instead of the PS2 games he was being issued) and Dasa, militant Hindu extremist (successfully exonerated on all charges due to fantasy defence)
By room you mean cell right? (You've been disputing yourself for the last 3 pages!)
Originally posted by robbie carrobieOn what grounds do you claim Dasa's "freedom of thought" has been limited by him (and his hate speech) being rejected by this community? Do you agree or disagree with the view that hate speech is a behaviour that has demonstrable social costs?
You may mock but the time will come when you need Weasel legal services inc. to get you out of a tight spot! 😵 We defend genocidal maniacs, and psycho killers, quacks of all kinds. Clients include Anders Breivik (he hired us to get him decent playstation games instead of the PS2 games he was being issued) and Dasa, militant Hindu extremist (successfully exonerated on all charges due to fantasy defence)
02 May 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou haven't successfully defended the indefensible. All you've done is insult other posters and claim to have won the debate. You haven't presented a reasoned argument you've just invoked the Chewbacca defence.
Haha, I don't think so, I came and I have successfully defended the indefensible, sonhouse, deep thought have fallen into fiction, you have no answers to anything other than to reiterate that dasa deserved his ban and seem content to produce insipid bumber sticker sayings while I am counting Lincolns and sitting in a corner of my room!
Originally posted by DeepThoughtYes i have, you could not provide a single valid reason why Dasa's comments would result in any overt action except some speculative reasoning on the number of players that are registered (itself quite false because not all of them read the forums and even if they did there is no proof that it would cause them to do anything) and some bat crazy reference to Anders Breivik and an appeal to what is not known rather than what is. Sure i may have gone a little overboard with some jibes but its all good fun. 😵
You haven't successfully defended the indefensible. All you've done is insult other posters and claim to have won the debate. You haven't presented a reasoned argument you've just invoked the Chewbacca defence.
02 May 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhat evidence do you have that Dasa was "punished for merely thinking" and not punished "for what [he] actually said"?
The issue is not me, its not even Dasa, heck its not even what Dasa actually said! The issue is whether you can be condemned and punished for merely 'thinking'. This is the issue being discussed in this thread.
02 May 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou've made an appeal to ignorance. That I cannot cite an actual case of Dasa's posts leading to an attack does not imply that it is impossible, or even unlikely, that such a call may be a contributing factor in an attack. What is more I cited the case of Breivik because he visited extremist websites before carrying out his attack. Correlation does not prove causation, but it is evidence of it. So I've provided some evidence which spoils your appeal to ignorance and your approach is to dismiss it as "bat crazy". I think this is evidence of you having lost the argument.
Yes i have, you could not provide a single valid reason why Dasa's comments would result in any overt action except some speculative reasoning on the number of players that are registered (itself quite false because not all of them read the forums and even if they did there is no proof that it would cause them to do anything) and some bat crazy refer ...[text shortened]... than what is. Sure i may have gone a little overboard with some jibes but its all good fun. 😵
02 May 16
2 edits
Originally posted by DeepThoughtOk I will come out of retirement just for this,
You've made an appeal to ignorance. That I cannot cite an actual case of Dasa's posts leading to an attack does not imply that it is impossible, or even unlikely, that such a call may be a contributing factor in an attack. What is more I cited the case of Breivik because he visited extremist websites before carrying out his attack. Correlation does no ...[text shortened]... oach is to dismiss it as "bat crazy". I think this is evidence of you having lost the argument.
Your assertion that RHP, Time for chess etc would be a plausible port of call for anyone considering extremist activity is about as bat crazy as you can get. Heck its RJHindsxSuzzianne^10 crazy! Its like all rationality has been lost in the recoiling of your moral sensibilities. Sonhouse has a guy sitting with a Semi automatic gun perusing RHP looking for and being influenced by Dasa's text! My goodness lets hope the BJP and Mr Modi don't play chess, we wouldn't want another recurrence of the 2001 riots in Ayodhya with angry mobs clutching Dasa's text in clenched fists! It could just be the spark that ignites it all over again.