Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Then what is the significance of the word "eternity"?
Just who should be answering this question? Surely people who make routine use of the term and place it at the centre of their claim for attention. If "eternal life" is a central claim of your faith, and employed by you in a bid to convert me to your faith, then there is some onus on you to define and clarify what that means. After all, when you propose something without evidence I am entitled to refute it without evidence. For the moment I am saying it is an empty category, since there is no way of attaching meaning to it in the physical world.
Any attempt to project any form of material existence into the future will hit a wall of unreason without ever needing to approach infinite time. For example, all stars burn hydrogen and make helium. Since they require that fuel to continue in operation, then when they inevitably run out of fuel, they will all die and the universe will be dead. That black, inert, silent and still universe is a reasonable impression of what eternal life might entail and it is, of course, nonsensical, since it will not support any life whatever. You might prefer to project a succession of universes emerging through a sequence of Big Bangs (for example) but the conditions for any meaningful continuity between this and the next universe in such a series are hard to comprehend; I do not have to try but you do if that is your preferred model for eternity.
Maybe you want to abandon the concept of bodily resurrection - and with it, the associated claims made by Christianity and Islam. Asking atheists to explain eternity is absurd, since atheism makes no claims regarding eternity whatever and has no need to use the term.
The use of the term "eternal" is utterly confused and without clarification should be removed from our discussions entirely.