03 Jul 15
Originally posted by RJHindsYou're sinking sir. Let go of the elephant!
Yes it could be, but why would they use the biblical name Eve, which was the mother of all living and was at least 1,000 years before Noah and those four women?
The only logical and reasonable answer is it was a mistake or meant to deceive. If it was not meant as deception, then they must have orginally thought this women was the equivalent of the biblical Eve.
06 Jul 15
2 edits
Originally posted by RJHindsThree wives, descendants of Eve? Where did the men come from to MAKE them descendants? Are you saying they were born of A@E? Then the wives would have been sisters of the sons. Maybe there were more men then A and E was living in adultery.
The three wives were the descendants of Eve the true mother of all living humans. 😏
06 Jul 15
Originally posted by RJHindsSo, according to you, people either thought the planet Mars is the god Mars, or it was a mistake or meant to deceive?
The only logical and reasonable answer is it was a mistake or meant to deceive.
No, people name things for a whole variety of reasons and they do not expect everyone to be quite a dumb as you. There was no deception intended. And they never ever thought the woman in question was the Biblical Eve nor did they think she was the first female human.
07 Jul 15
Originally posted by sonhouseAll you have to do is read Genesis in the Holy Bible and you might not be so ignorant. You will see that all men and women were the descendants of Adam and Eve within the first few chapters, and that Adam named his wife Eve because she was to become the mother of all living humans.
Three wives, descendants of Eve? Where did the men come from to MAKE them descendants? Are you saying they were born of A@E? Then the wives would have been sisters of the sons. Maybe there were more men then A and E was living in adultery.
07 Jul 15
Originally posted by twhiteheadAdam named his wife Eve because she was to become the mother of all living humans. These evolutionists also named this fictional DNA person Eve either because they wanted to deceive the readers of their paper or they were ignorant of the true meaning of that name. 😏
So, according to you, people either thought the planet Mars is the god Mars, or it was a mistake or meant to deceive?
No, people name things for a whole variety of reasons and they do not expect everyone to be quite a dumb as you. There was no deception intended. And they never ever thought the woman in question was the Biblical Eve nor did they think she was the first female human.
07 Jul 15
2 edits
Originally posted by RJHindsWe all know the A&E story was just that, a story, a mythology designed to rope people into the new religion of the time. There are thousands of such tales around the world but you refuse to even acknowledge the existence of other tales like it. Adam and Eve is just one more BS tale with no basis in fact.
Adam named his wife Eve because she was to become the mother of all living humans. These evolutionists also named this fictional DNA person Eve either because they wanted to deceive the readers of their paper or they were ignorant of the true meaning of that name. 😏
For one thing, starting with a single pair of DNA combinations, in 6000 years it would be impossible for the amount of diversity we see in DNA today. And it is even worse than that in your mythology, the Noah tale reduced whatever diversity our accumulated DNA had to practically zero, a complete reset of the DNA pool of the entire race of Homo Sapiens Sapiens so making it even more tenuous your ridiculous arguments about the diversity of humanity.
That is another piece of BS you cannot refute or accept any refutation because of your extreme bias. You are, like I have said time and time again, a one trick pony unable to bend even a little with the wind. The wind gets high enough and the strongest tree breaks. As more and more evidence accumulates refuting the BS 6000 year date of Earth, the less and less you will have to put up in bogus video's and the more stupid you look to everyone else, if that is actually possible.
07 Jul 15
1 edit
Originally posted by sonhouseI believe you are more biased than i am toward your screwed up belief about evilution and billions of years. I don't care how long you give it, a molecule is never going to become a living cell and a bacteria is never going to be a man. The bacteria may need us to live, but it is never going to become us. If you give bacteria long enough, it could turn us into fertilizer.
We all know the A&E story was just that, a story, a mythology designed to rope people into the new religion of the time. There are thousands of such tales around the world but you refuse to even acknowledge the existence of other tales like it. Adam and Eve is just one more BS tale with no basis in fact.
For one thing, starting with a single pair of DNA ...[text shortened]... up in bogus video's and the more stupid you look to everyone else, if that is actually possible.
07 Jul 15
Originally posted by RJHindsThey were neither ignorant of the meaning, nor did they want to deceive. They simply had another reason for their choice of name. Sometimes you should simply admit you said something stupid and move on.
These evolutionists also named this fictional DNA person Eve either because they wanted to deceive the readers of their paper or they were ignorant of the true meaning of that name. 😏
07 Jul 15
Originally posted by twhiteheadI can move on, but i will not admit i said something stupid because I am....
They were neither ignorant of the meaning, nor did they want to deceive. They simply had another reason for their choice of name. Sometimes you should simply admit you said something stupid and move on.
The Near Genius 😏