1. Joined
    15 Oct '06
    Moves
    10115
    29 Nov '15 18:066 edits
    Originally posted by Suzianne
    Some Jews were wrong. The ones who were used to living off the fat of the Temple, and who had clear reason for nay-saying Jesus, were wrong. The ones who made a mockery of His Father's house by selling animals for sacrifice at inflated rates and the money changers who charged huge fees were wrong. Not "all" Jews. Jesus did not come to relieve Jews of their need to follow God's laws.
    Like murder, slavery is wrong now, was always wrong and will always be wrong.

    Jesus understood this:
    Matthew 7
    12 So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets.


    There is no room for condoning slavery in the above. The depiction of God as condoning slavery in the OT is wrong. The ancient Jews were wrong to depict this as the will of God.

    You can keep trying to defend the depiction of God as condoning slavery if you like, but it's a ridiculously absurd depiction as is your defense of it. It's not the God of Jesus. YOUR God is ridiculously absurd.
  2. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    29 Nov '15 19:23
    Originally posted by ThinkOfOne
    You can keep trying to defend the depiction of God as condoning slavery if you like, but it's a ridiculously absurd depiction as is your defense of it. It's not the God of Jesus. YOUR God is ridiculously absurd.
    Whose god is better? Suzi's god or ToO's god?

    There's only one way to find out!

    F I G H T !!!

    http://harryhill.wikia.com/wiki/Which_is_better%3F_There's_only_one_way_to_find_out:_FIGHT!
  3. Joined
    15 Oct '06
    Moves
    10115
    29 Nov '15 19:25
    Originally posted by wolfgang59
    Whose god is better? Suzi's god or ToO's god?

    There's only one way to find out!

    F I G H T !!!

    http://harryhill.wikia.com/wiki/Which_is_better%3F_There's_only_one_way_to_find_out:_FIGHT!
    If you read a bit more carefully, you'd know that actually it's Jesus' God vs Suzi's God.
  4. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    29 Nov '15 19:461 edit
    Originally posted by ThinkOfOne
    If you read a bit more carefully, you'd know that actually it's Jesus' God vs Suzi's God.
    No, its your interpretation of Jesus' God vs Suzi's interpretation of Jesus' God.

    Or your and Suzi's interpretations of Paul, Matthew, Mark, Luke and Johns interpretations.
  5. Joined
    15 Oct '06
    Moves
    10115
    29 Nov '15 20:223 edits
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    No, its your interpretation of Jesus' God vs Suzi's interpretation of Jesus' God.

    Or your and Suzi's interpretations of Paul, Matthew, Mark, Luke and Johns interpretations.
    If it's only MY "interpretation", then you should have no trouble demonstrating how there is room for condoning slavery in Matthew 7:12.

    While you're at it, you can also demonstrate how the words attributed to Jesus in Matthew 7:12 are Matthew's "interpretation".

    This should be interesting.
  6. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    30 Nov '15 04:14
    Originally posted by ThinkOfOne
    If you read a bit more carefully, you'd know that actually it's Jesus' God vs Suzi's God.
    How very humble of you ...
  7. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    30 Nov '15 06:54
    Originally posted by ThinkOfOne
    If it's only MY "interpretation", then you should have no trouble demonstrating how there is room for condoning slavery in Matthew 7:12.
    You mean I must present my interpretation of Matthews interpretation? And for some reason it must differ from yours or you can conclude that your interpretation is actually Jesus' true teaching?
    Sorry, but I see some flaws in your logic.
  8. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    30 Nov '15 07:04
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    You mean I must present my interpretation of Matthews interpretation? And for some reason it must differ from yours or you can conclude that your interpretation is actually Jesus' true teaching?
    Sorry, but I see some flaws in your logic.
    Maybe it is the plank in your own eye that you see.
  9. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    30 Nov '15 08:04
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    Maybe it is the plank in your own eye that you see.
    I can see the plank quite clearly. In elegant script on its surface is carved the text "RJHinds has a log in his eye".
  10. SubscriberSuzianne
    Misfit Queen
    Isle of Misfit Toys
    Joined
    08 Aug '03
    Moves
    36669
    30 Nov '15 10:32
    Originally posted by ThinkOfOne
    Like murder, slavery is wrong now, was always wrong and will always be wrong.

    Jesus understood this:
    Matthew 7
    12 So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets.


    There is no room for condoning slavery in the above. The depiction of God as condoning slavery in the OT is ...[text shortened]... depiction as is your defense of it. It's not the God of Jesus. YOUR God is ridiculously absurd.
    And if you think God has ever "condoned" slavery, then you're wrong, too.

    Yeah, I see a perception problem here.
  11. SubscriberSuzianne
    Misfit Queen
    Isle of Misfit Toys
    Joined
    08 Aug '03
    Moves
    36669
    30 Nov '15 10:34
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    So I must apply? And I may or may not deserve it? Did you also have to apply? On what basis were you found deserving?
    Seriously, you claimed that we were born equal with equal rights and deserving of equal things. I want to know why I must apply and you did not, and why I must be found deserving or not whereas you had to undergo no such scrutiny.
    Everyone is automatically a citizen of the country they were born in. How is that not clear? And if you want to be a citizen of a country you were not born in, then you must apply for citizenship. How is this not clear?
  12. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    30 Nov '15 10:53
    Originally posted by Suzianne
    Everyone is automatically a citizen of the country they were born in. How is that not clear? And if you want to be a citizen of a country you were not born in, then you must apply for citizenship. How is this not clear?
    So it appears that you hold two contradictory facts to be 'self evident'.
    What is very clear to me is that if everyone is automatically a citizen of the country they are born in, then they are not born equal.
  13. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    03 Jan '13
    Moves
    13080
    01 Dec '15 00:571 edit
  14. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    01 Dec '15 05:36
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    I can see the plank quite clearly. In elegant script on its surface is carved the text "RJHinds has a log in his eye".
    Only eye floaters. 😏
  15. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    01 Dec '15 05:49
    Originally posted by ThinkOfOne
    If you read a bit more carefully, you'd know that actually it's Jesus' God vs Suzi's God.
    What happened to your god?

    Or don't you have one?
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree