Originally posted by ThinkOfOne
You don't seem to understand Leviticus 25 very well.
In the following God speaks of Israelite indentured servants and makes a clear distinction between them and slaves.
Leviticus 25
39“ ‘If any of your fellow Israelites become poor and sell themselves to you, do not make them work as slaves. ... 40They are to be treated as hired workers or temporary residents ...
... 42Because the Israelites are my servants, whom I brought out of Egypt, they must not be sold as slaves. 43Do not rule over them ruthlessly, but fear your God.
You're saying that
Israelites could not be called
"slaves" but the foreigners here could be called
"slaves." However, other translations show both are slaves, but some distinction in supervision is made.
This comes out in the Holman Christian Standard Bible's translation.
Holman Christian Standard Bible
They are not to be sold as slaves, because they are My slaves that I brought out of the land of Egypt.
[my bolding]
The same understanding is given by the
Young's Literal Translation
Young's Literal Translation
For they are My servants, whom I have brought out from the land of Egypt: they are not sold with the sale of a servant;
Here we see Hebrew slaves and foreigner slaves.
Or we see Hebrew servants and foreigner servants.
God says there essentially "They
(Israelites) are My servants ... they shall not be sold as servants". The same Hebrew word is used twice there which is in Strong's Concordance as Entry 5650 in the Hebrew Dictionary -
BONDMEN.
I think this takes some of the wind out of your sails in saying Israelites could not be slaves but the foreigners, now God condoned slavery for them.
To be fair there is a different word used in
verse 46
In various English translations I see -
"slaves for life"
"permanent slaves"
"bondmen forever"
"bond slaves"
"enslave perpetually"
The foreign slave, like the Hebrew slave may want to remain his or her master's permanent servant -
"But if he servant plainly says, I love my master, my wife and my children, I will not go out free.
Then his master shall bring him to God and shall bring him to the door or to the doorpost, and his master shall bore his ear through with an awl; and he shall serve him forever." (Exodus 21:5,6)
This is the case of Israelite slave who voluntarily chooses to be his servant's perpetually.
If the foreign slave had no recourse but to serve forever, then it would not fit that God made provision for those who became of means enough to not only be free but have slaves themselves.
Even if a foreigner became a permanent servant God's laws prevented the Israelite master from taking advantage of him. If a foreign servant was being mistreated by his Israelite master so that he ran away from the harshness, he could escape to another Israelite home for shelter and protection.
"You shall not hand over to his master a slave who has escaped from his master to you. He shall live with you in your midst, in the place which he shall choose in one of your towns where it pleases him; you shall not mistreat [oppress] him." (Deut. 23:15,16)
"This provision wasn't simply for a foriegn slave running
to Israel but also for a foreign servant
within Israel who was being mistreated. Israel's legislation regarding foreign slaves showed concern for their well-being, very much unlike the Code of Hammurabu, for example, which had no regard for an owner's treatment of his slaves." - Paul Copan
In the prophet
Isaiah God shows His compassion for Gentile fugitives fleeing Moab.
" ... Hide the outcasts; Do not expose him who wanders. Let the outcasts of Moab dwell with you; Be a hiding place to them from the destroyer. (Isa. 16:3c,4a)
While you wish to libelously slander the character of God, His heart and His law prove Him compassionate toward the oppressed. While your motive is to show God "condoned" oppression (the apparent intention of the condoning slavery accusation) the prophets reveal His true heart.