@earl-of-trumps said
Hi. what are you?
---
I'm a Libertarian.
---
And what do Libertarians stand for?
---
We want FREEDOM!
------
... I KEEL you!!! 😠




Rough crowd out there

Not wajoma. He wants justice.

@earl-of-trumps said
... And Including Third-Party Candidates Expands Trump's Lead CNN
----------------
Former President Donald Trump has opened his biggest lead ever captured in the CNN poll of the American electorate, enjoying a six-point advantage over incumbent Democrat President Joe Biden.

Trump, at 49 percent, is six percent ahead of Biden’s 43 percent when the tw ...[text shortened]... d-trump-takes-biggest-lead-ever-over-joe-biden-in-cnn-poll-third-party-candidates-expand-trump-lead/

Looks like your chosen man is on track for a huge swing in November then huh?

@kevcvs57 said
They never said that at all, they just didn’t bother prosecuting it, Trump has spent four years lying about the 2020 election because he’s too much of bed wetter to take a rejection and a loss.
He’s literally raging at the electorate and he means to get even with them like a nasty stalky ex boyfriend.
He’s convinced laws aren’t meant for men like him so maybe the law is chucking everything it can at him to prove him wrong.

ummm yes they did...

"The FEC voted 4-1 to close the inquiry after failing to find that Trump or his campaign “knowingly and willfully” violated campaign finance law"

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/552271-fec-drops-investigation-into-trump-hush-money-payments/

@wildgrass said
Lol no. Did you read that in the national inquirer?

The fec panel dropped that case for reasons of "prosecutorial discretion"

nope, you lie

"The FEC voted 4-1 to close the inquiry after failing to find that Trump or his campaign “knowingly and willfully” violated campaign finance law"

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/552271-fec-drops-investigation-into-trump-hush-money-payments/

@wildgrass said
Lol you said he didn't break the law.

The FEC actually said they don't want to waste resources.

https://www.axios.com/2021/05/07/fec-drop-trump-hush-money-case

you reference a case about cohen, not trump

@earl-of-trumps said
... And Including Third-Party Candidates Expands Trump's Lead CNN
----------------
Former President Donald Trump has opened his biggest lead ever captured in the CNN poll of the American electorate, enjoying a six-point advantage over incumbent Democrat President Joe Biden.

Trump, at 49 percent, is six percent ahead of Biden’s 43 percent when the tw ...[text shortened]... d-trump-takes-biggest-lead-ever-over-joe-biden-in-cnn-poll-third-party-candidates-expand-trump-lead/

I predict Trump will be defeated by an absolute landslide, and that will have two results:

1) Republican screaming will dwarf 2020 levels, and certain extremists (pointing to the inaccurate polls) will try to overthrow the government again but much more seriously this time.

2) Political polling will be declared dead.

Or, I could be wrong, and the American people could be on track for making the biggest mistake in history. There isn't a bigger mistake a democracy CAN make than electing a frustrated, vindictive, narcissistic demagogue. I don't think America will do that, though.

Either way, this November is not going to be pleasant.

@averagejoe1 said
@AverageJoe1
THE crime.

Again, not ALL of alleged crimes of All cases. Obviously not my OP.

What's the crime in the so-called hush-money case? Falsifying financial records. Here's a summary from the indictment:

1. violated FECA's restrictions on corporate and individual contributions.

2. violated FECA through unlawful individual and corporate contributions by Cohen, Pecker, and AMI; and...by falsifying the records of other New York enterprises and mischaracterizing the nature of the repayment for tax purposes.

3. violated New York tax law.

@cliff-mashburn said
Would it be considering "interfering" if a candidate posted lies about a laptop being fake and claiming it was proven because he had signatures from 50 CIA/FBI agents saying so, even though he KNEW the laptop was real and belonged to his son?

Does hypocrisy negate the existence of a crime? Like no one is a criminal if both "sides" are equally guilty?

@mott-the-hoople said
"The FBI defines terrorism, according to U.S. law, specifically 18 U.S.C., section 2331, which defines terrorism, both domestic and international, as any activity that is violent, or dangerous to human life, which violates federal or state law, and appears to be intended to: Intimidate or coerce a civilian population"

these campus >protestors< fit this definition

All protests can fit that description.
Which obviously undermines the use of it.

@divegeester said
Why only one?
Why don’t they settle in ANY of the EU countries?
How can they be “refugees” when they are coming from EU countries?
Why is the UK so much more attractive than EU countries that they risk their lives to get here?
Why should the UK take hundreds of thousands of illegal migrants whom the EU won’t take?

Etc etc …

No. The Schengen agreement states that you can ask ayslum in 1 Schengen country. And if that’s rejected, you can can’t ask for asylum in another Schengen country.

So, these refugees ask for asylum in Europe (one of the Schengen countries), if the request is rejected (which happens on an individual basis and is therefore hard to say anything useful about) then the refugee has to return home or request asylum in a non-Schengen country.

If they’re coming to England via Europe, that’s probably what’s happening, don’t you think?

@rajk999 said
Large scale illegal immigration should be stopped dead in its tracts. I can understand a few people being persecuted and need to leave the country. Hundreds or thousands or millions ... NFW... Stop them. Send them back. Investige why this is happening. Offer some help. Eg there is a ruthless government maybe Islamic Extremists took over the country and killing nonMuslim ...[text shortened]... nd help set up a democratic government.

You cannot destroy your house and then come live in mine.

It’s not illegal immigration if a refugee is requesting asylum. It’s international law.

90% of the problems jn the Middle-East and Africa were created by the West interfering there. One doesn’t presume the answer is in even more interference, eh.

@divegeester said
No. They’re coming to the UK because a) they see the UK as the best place for them to live, and/or b) because they’ve been refused asylum in the EU.

The latter is obviously correct.
The first is a dodgy statement. Why would they come over Europe to get to Britain?

The majority of refugees ask for asylum in the first country they arrive in.

It’s not like fleeing a country is fun or that people smugglers are nice people you want to hang around with.

@rajk999 said
READ before blurting out nonsense.
I said the protests should be put down.
I said nothing about young people.

As you mention that these young people who come out and support terrorism and Hamas should be prosecuted according to the law.

They are out protesting Israel, not supporting Hamas.

@Earl-of-Trumps
So you think your god is above the law. Biden or Democrats have nothing to do with grand juries, they are ordinary people looking at evidence and shame on you for implying they are corrupt. The evidence is provided just like any other case and if anything, Trump has been given a golden glove treatment like on how the judge is treating his outrageous bursts of BS in his "Truth" Social and speaking to the crowd which just makes the base THINK his is getting screwed when in fact it is nothing of the kind, it is showing exactly how he did illegal things.
If you or I had the same charges the trial would have been over a lot faster and we would be in jail.