Originally posted by AttilaTheHornGame 10766813 This game of mine is also not depleting time off my opponents timebank even though it says it is. What's up with that? Anyone know?
I have one game, No. 10827303 against fredmitch01, in which his timebank is supposed to be depleting, but for the last few hours, it has remained the same. Is there a glitch somewhere?
Originally posted by RussHello Russ,
A small number of users with names that were just numeric have had an "a" appended to their name during the recent update. If your account name changed, and you strongly dislike the new name, then send site feedback to get your account name changed.
Originally posted by Sebastian YapThe only difference is, my opponent made the move in 38 that lead to the position and I made the other two. during our move in 38 that position was reached once. During our moves in 41 the position was reached twice. During our moves in 43 I moved into the same position for the third time.
You only had 2 fold repetition. Only after 41... Qf5 and 43... Kf8 is the same. 38. Qe2 is not the same.
Read my post carefully again. See what is the difference between 38 and the other 2.
Originally posted by Sebastian YapYou telling me why the third repetition of position in this game supposedly is not valid, has no forbearance on the outcome of this game. You're not offering or giving me advice that would change the outcome of this game. I have sent feedback. Thanks for your help in the help forum, but I think you are completely wrong. I have gone over it, over and over again, and I'm sober. It is the third repetition of position in this game.
I will tell you after your game has ended.
Originally posted by Sebastian Yap"Third repetition of a position. If any identical position appears three times during a game, then the game can be claimed as a draw. Please note that each repetition must be identical with regards to en passant and castling availability. A draw can only be claimed along with a move that contributes to a repetition. Claiming after the repetition has occurred is not possible, unless the same position can be repeated again on a future move" (FAQ).
No, it is not. You don't know the rule properly.
Originally posted by Sebastian YapYes, I did, 38 Qc4e2, a move that my opponent made, makes the third repetition of position that match with moves 41 and 43. Go over it again and you will see.
No, you didnt have 3-fold repetition. You only had 2 fold repetition. Only after 41... Qf5 and 43... Kf8 is the same. 38. Qe2 is not the same.
Originally posted by KilgoreTrout15Segregation is the answer? You really are a lose anal-ed tool. It's Time to put you freaks back where you belong. In the back of the bus. How's President Obama working out for you? Good!!!!
You can start here.
2. Why is it happening? That's obvious but I won't say because all the libtards would cry about the answer.
3. A remedy? Segregation is the obvious solution, it worked before we became "enlightened" in the 60's.