Hinds has informed me that Nondenominational Christianity is the correct religion and further that all sects of Denominational Christianity have at least one minor error. Hinds, however, will not reveal what this error is. The fate of millions of souls depends on this crucial knowledge, but I guess that Hinds is not interested in sharing this information despite its' critical importance!
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 116964
Originally posted by 667joePresumably RJHinds is a non-denominational Christian himself. I wonder what what the single error there is in his belief system ,and I do hope it's not something his version of God would think he "deserved to burn in hell" for.
Hinds has informed me that Nondenominational Christianity is the correct religion and further that all sects of Denominational Christianity have at least one minor error. Hinds, however, will not reveal what this error is. The fate of millions of souls depends on this crucial knowledge, but I guess that Hinds is not interested in sharing this information despite its' critical importance!
28 Apr 15
Originally posted by 667joeHe said, "I believe all [Christian denominations] have at least one minor error."
Hinds has informed me that Nondenominational Christianity is the correct religion and further that all sects of Denominational Christianity have at least one minor error. Hinds, however, will not reveal what this error is. The fate of millions of souls depends on this crucial knowledge, but I guess that Hinds is not interested in sharing this information despite its' critical importance!
At least one. Could be more. And certainly, not all denominations have the same error. And he may not "know" what each denomination's error (or errors) is. As he said, he just believes each one has at least one error. Why must you browbeat him over this?
You keep asking him, "what is this one error you speak of?", as if there is only one error shared by all denominations. He cannot list every single denomination and categorize its errors. You demand of him a herculean task.
And some here actually hold the opinion that Christians here are not regularly attacked for their beliefs. Unbelievable.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 116964
28 Apr 15
Originally posted by SuzianneThe whole point of this forum is to attack religious people for thier beliefs, have you not realised that yet.
He said, "I believe all [Christian denominations] have at least one minor error."
At least one. Could be more. And certainly, not all denominations have the same error. And he may not "know" what each denomination's error (or errors) is. As he said, he just believes each one has at least one error. Why must you browbeat him over this?
You keep as ...[text shortened]... ld the opinion that Christians here are not regularly attacked for their beliefs. Unbelievable.
28 Apr 15
Originally posted by divegeesterAttacking people who can defend themselves is one thing.
The whole point of this forum is to attack religious people for thier beliefs, have you not realised that yet.
Throwing a sackful of kittens off a bridge into the river is quite another.
(And yeah, I realized that long ago. But God forbid I ever actually say that. See the "Why are Christians under attack ?" thread.)
28 Apr 15
1 edit
Originally posted by SuzianneIf he knows the minor error in every denomination, then I don't see a problem with him listing them. He could do ten a day if more than that is too much for him.
He cannot list every single denomination and categorize its errors. You demand of him a herculean task.
If on the other hand, he does not know the actual error that each denomination has, but hold the belief for other reasons, then he can simply say so.
The argument that listing them would be too laborious is spurious as I am sure you know.
And some here actually hold the opinion that Christians here are not regularly attacked for their beliefs. Unbelievable.
Everyone, Christians included, gets 'attacked for their beliefs' (or lack thereof) in a debate setting. That is almost the definition of debate. Some threads are much more discussion than debate with much less attacking going on.
But when it comes to attacking, you are one of the worst posters on the forum with many of your posts being nothing but attack, with statements you don't actually yourself believe to be true, but just said purely for the sake of being antagonistic.
I think Duchess is probably worse though, and Dasa is all out at calling everybody dishonest etc, but one gets the impression he actually thinks that way rather than merely being hateful as you are.
