Religious People Understand the World Less

Religious People Understand the World Less

Spirituality

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Cape Town

Joined
14 Apr 05
Moves
52945
27 Oct 16

Originally posted by divegeester
I have no bias against women; I married one.
Marrying a woman is not evidence that you are not biased against them.

Cape Town

Joined
14 Apr 05
Moves
52945
27 Oct 16

Originally posted by divegeester
The whole article is bullshlt; why don't you lighten up a bit.
Is it? Your evidence, argument for this?

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
117437
27 Oct 16

Originally posted by twhitehead
Marrying a woman is not evidence that you are not biased against them.
Of course it isn't; it's called humour ๐Ÿ˜‰

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
117437
27 Oct 16

Originally posted by twhitehead
Is it? Your evidence, argument for this?
My argument that it's bullshlt is my opinion.
Bullshlt is a technical term by the way.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
27 Oct 16
1 edit

All this deeper understanding of the world from these secular fellas is just overwhelming.

Can someone explain why the world's first double helix section of DNA replicated itself ?

Cape Town

Joined
14 Apr 05
Moves
52945
27 Oct 16

Originally posted by sonship
All this deeper understanding of the world from these secular fellas is just overwhelming.

Can someone explain why the world's first double helix section of DNA replicated itself ?
Chemistry.
I could point you to some courses on DNA replication if you want.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
28 Oct 16
1 edit

Originally posted by twhitehead
Chemistry.
I could point you to some courses on DNA replication if you want.
Can someone explain why the world's first double helix section of DNA replicated itself ?


The answer is, of course, over there.

Cape Town

Joined
14 Apr 05
Moves
52945
28 Oct 16
1 edit

Originally posted by sonship
Can someone explain why the world's first double helix section of DNA replicated itself ?


The answer is, of course, over there.
Did you expect me to give you a three year university course in biochemistry in one post?

DNA replicated because of chemistry. That is a fact. If you want to understand how, you need to learn chemistry.

looking for loot

western colorado

Joined
05 Feb 11
Moves
9664
28 Oct 16

Replication doesn't require double helix.

I'm not convinced that religious people understand the world less. They are a whole bunch of stupid, but so are the rest of us.

Jo'Burg South Africa

Joined
20 Mar 06
Moves
70362
28 Oct 16

Originally posted by apathist
Replication doesn't require double helix.

I'm not convinced that religious people understand the world less. They are a whole bunch of stupid, but so are the rest of us.
LOL - so true.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53228
28 Oct 16
2 edits

Originally posted by Nicksten
LOL - so true.
That's a new one, on your profile, the big bang came out of god's mouth. Whatever floats your boat I guess. Science at least can't prove you wrong, for a few decades or a century maybe anyway. Give you a plus for creativity anyway๐Ÿ™‚ is that your idea or did you just parrot it from some other source? And how do you know it was not from some other orifice of your god?

Cape Town

Joined
14 Apr 05
Moves
52945
28 Oct 16
1 edit

Originally posted by apathist
I'm not convinced that religious people understand the world less. They are a whole bunch of stupid, but so are the rest of us.
It is a statistical claim, not a blanket claim.
I think there is good evidence that religiosity correlates inversely to science education - therefore it is highly likely that religious people do, on average, understand the world less.

In this forum, the correlation are very strong and evident. I suspect that this forum does not reflect general numbers.

Jo'Burg South Africa

Joined
20 Mar 06
Moves
70362
28 Oct 16

Originally posted by sonhouse
That's a new one, on your profile, the big bang came out of god's mouth. Whatever floats your boat I guess. Science at least can't prove you wrong, for a few decades or a century maybe anyway. Give you a plus for creativity anyway๐Ÿ™‚ is that your idea or did you just parrot it from some other source? And how do you know it was not from some other orifice of your god?
Let me quote you correctly - my profile reads "The big bang was the sound that came out of God's mouth" - I surely didn't invent that "saying", but I have heard many say it before me which makes me that parrot then. The rest of my profile is purely me ๐Ÿ˜‰

The fact is, in which I saw huge humor was that apathist said we're all a bunch of stupid - that meant stupid whether or not you believed in God, no God, FSM, evolution etc.

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
28792
28 Oct 16

Originally posted by Nicksten
Let me quote you correctly - my profile reads "The big bang was the sound that came out of God's mouth" - I surely didn't invent that "saying", but I have heard many say it before me which makes me that parrot then. The rest of my profile is purely me ๐Ÿ˜‰

The fact is, in which I saw huge humor was that apathist said we're all a bunch of stupid - that meant stupid whether or not you believed in God, no God, FSM, evolution etc.
In the great scheme of things, we (human beings) really don't know very much.

The irony is, when we do finally have more of the answers and shaken off our collective stupidity, we'll all probably be wiped out by a rogue asteroid.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53228
28 Oct 16

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
In the great scheme of things, we (human beings) really don't know very much.

The irony is, when we do finally have more of the answers and shaken off our collective stupidity, we'll all probably be wiped out by a rogue asteroid.
rogue or aimed....