My typical O'Kelly Variation, offered at the earliest possible opportunity -- something that gets me in trouble if c4 is played before Nc3 or some other disqualifying move.

Slowing the eventual queenside expansion. I have no real argument against that.

I'm can't recall ever losing with the pawn structure of the O'Kelly Sicilian vs the pawn structure of a KIA derivative, but I acknowledge that pressure on the long light-squared diagonal could be quite an asset.

My development is almost mechanical.

I'd like to play d5 but, g2 bishop and the lack of an f3 knight make that impossible.

A nearly typical O'Kelly position (except for the fianchetto).

A KIA idea I'm familiar with, from my play with Dr. Frank Greiner of Mobile, AL. Never seen it in this context.

A silly sort of idea, maybe, but I'm tempting f4, overexposing his kingside (IMHO).

My development is complete. He has unwound his a bit.

d6 is lost.