He’s a narcissist.
Everything is about defending his weak little ego.

A judge has power over him, and that is not possible (in his mind), so he lashes out, constantly bending truths and facts to suit what his ego needs.

It’s actually quite fascinating to see it play out like this. Most narcissists are quiet about it and just beat up their wives and the like.

Ever notice how interested the crowds look ar his rallies?
Bored to death is how they look.

It’s very strange.

@mchill said
Get this MF out of my democratic government NOW!!!


Marjorie Taylor Greene might just do this for you.

Ahhh MtG… the republicans just keep coughing up hit after hit…

@wajoma said
No, because when there's no prosperity there are no schools, and then it's a choice between working in a mine or starving.

Here's an experiment for you, child labor still exists today a great deal in Africa mining lithium for batteries in rich people cars, you go there and tell them it's against the regulations lol lol haha, wadda pseud boy doody for brains you are.

Th ...[text shortened]... ulators are parasites, it is the prosperity created by others that allows the parasites to parasite.

1. If you have regulations you need to enforce them.
2. Not all these countries have proper regulations.

Your quaint notion of markets managing workers’ and human rights is as absurd as Ayn Rand’s hypocrisy.

Child labour in the West was not stopped by wealth, it was stopped through regulation, with the captains of industry opposing it each step of the way.

Perhaps read some history, instead of spanking your monkey whilst shrugging the atlas.

$26.61

I have no idea what that means.
I suppose trump will have shorted it somehow, so still ends up making money after the suckers who support him have lost all their earnings.

Or is that not a thing?
God knows.

trump the historian:

"Gettysburg, what an unbelievable battle that was," Trump said during a Saturday rally in Schnecksville, Pennsylvania, in what was his first campaign event in the battleground state. "It was so much, and so interesting, and so vicious and horrible, and so beautiful in so many different ways—it represented such a big portion of the success of this country," he continued.

"Gettysburg, wow—I go to Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, to look and to watch," he said. "And the statement of Robert E. Lee, who's no longer in favor—did you ever notice it? He's no longer in favor. 'Never fight uphill, me boys, never fight uphill.' They were fighting uphill, he said, 'Wow, that was a big mistake,' he lost his great general. 'Never fight uphill, me boys,' but it was too late," Trump added.

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-gettysburg-civil-war-historian-1890325

Yes. He is a funny guy…

@averagejoe1 said
I am NOT being funny.....is not Biden being a dictator when he views our country being ruled by people instead of laws? YOu know, the tuition thingy, for example? I'm thinking I am obliged to do a thread shortly to enlighten you little fellers about Congress, the purse string thingy.

Politicians make laws.
You just don’t like this one.

@averagejoe1 said
Not exactly. Spruce, 3rd post on p 2, did not answer it there. (he posted a youtube, but did not answer. Certainly a youtube was not his answer?) So he did not answer on page 2.
Moonbus did answer on page 2, I must have missed it because of his unnecessary typing at the beginning. You guys can really get wordy. Did he mention Trump while he was at it. Anyway, ...[text shortened]... king traffic a crime?? Protest is legal. What a mess. Thanks libs. I missed my flight to Syria.

It has been mentioned before: unless you get an answer that fits your world view, you seem to think you’ve gone unanswered.

Take it from me lad, 99% of the time, you are wrong. On every subject.

Learn or live with it. Nobody outside the alt-right bubble agrees with you on anything.

@averagejoe1 said
So, you too? Don't understand the logic, common sense, rationale and the law with regard to the Roe decision?. What else could their findings have been? You are aware, I am sure, that their total deliberatoins are based solely on the provisions of the Constitution. Why, you seem to disagree with Constitutional law??

It’s funny how Roe vs Wade was possible, until fundamentalists took over the supreme court… and suddenly it’s not.

Anyhoo, as I’ve stated before, your supreme court and constitution both need a serious do-over; antiquated garbage.

@wajoma said
Lil sunstroker fella, it's prosperity that got children out of mines, not regulation.

And of course none of your post has anything to do with De Santis NOT banning heat protection.

No. It was largely due to regulation; forcing children to go to school.

@divegeester said
It’s (my issue) is not about “extreme right wing fantasists”, I’m not one. It’s about political independence. A country might sign up to a treaty but nowhere in that treaty will it state “if we don’t hit our targets we can be brought to court”. It’s a complete farce and there will be calls to leave the treaty, leave the EC. They’ve shot themselves in the foot.

PS spelt “shot” incorrectly and automod slapped me!

Haha (to the misspelling slap down by the bots).

No. See. This is a misconception. A treaty is international law, and it overrides national law (because you have to adhere to agreements that extend beyond your zone of control).

The UN charter on human rights is not a treaty = it’s a charter = goals and aims to aspire to.
The European convention on human rights (which is based on the charter) is a treaty; convention = treaty = overrides national law.

The European court didn’t judge on targets being met, but on the actions being taken to reach said targets. And found it wanting.

I hardly think there will be serious calls to leave the Council of Europe.

@divegeester said
You said that this ruling would be “binding on EU counties”.

You said that, not me.

It is. But it’s also binding in various non-EU countries.

They Speak English in England
That doesn’t mean they don’t speak it elsewhere.

@wajoma said
you ijit, it's banning heat protection laws, not banning heat protection.

Just another example of your over wrought rantings, not to be taken seriously about this, and so any legitimate thing you may say loses credibility.

The health and safety regulations weren’t introduced because companies were doing such a great job of regulating themselves.

@fartacus said
You just did what you're condemning us for.

You smell.

God damn read man, read!

Christ. It’s like talking to mongoloid fukking geese.

@fartacus said
Rational discussion?
You liberals think men can be women.

Rational my ass.

"You liberals"

Sweeping generalistic charactaristics are reserved for republikunts, who with their ideas and non-policies are generally considered moronic, retarded or mong.