Go back
Another Chess Biscuit Tin and Why You Lose

Another Chess Biscuit Tin and Why You Lose

The Planet Greenpawn



I have another chess themed biscuit tin. It is the same one I mentioned
on here five years ago. Now I have two! Here are the same pictures I
used back then. Using the same picture is me doing my bit for the planet
by keeping my carbon footprint to a minimum. I expect a Nobel Prize for this.

no title

It is called ‘Checkmate’ but the position on the biscuit tin...

no title

...is not ‘Checkmate.’


I was going to use this as the first puzzle but it is a bit mundane.

no title

I know what you are thinking. You think I only have one chess themed
biscuit tin and am saying I now have two just too make all of you jealous.

I may lie about my rating, famous films stars I have dated, mountains I have
climbed...but I would never lie about owning two chess themed biscuit tins.
puzzles

V. Bagirov - Y. Nikolaevsky, URS, 1959 (Black to play)

Look out. The obvious 1...Bxh3 does not win. 2 Bxg3.
1...Rxh3+ 2.gxh3 Be4+ 3.Nxe4 Qxh3+ mate next move.


E. Bogoljubov - P. Krueger, Germany 1931 (White to play)

If given time Black will play 1...exf6. Don’t give them time and then wrap it up.
1.Bc8! Qxc8 Anything else losses. 2. Qxh7+ Kxh7 3. Rh4 mate.


C. Murphy - E. Kirk, Coventry, 2025 (Black to Play)

Careful.
1...Nf4+ and then Qxc7 0-1. Not 1...Qxc7 2.f3 is checkmate.

green bar


news

No news this week. I daresay something has happened in the chess world since I
last posted but nothing of any great interest. Karpov is still the world champion.
end of news

*** Another One Sentence Book Review ***


Recently I played a game in the 7 day ladder, it opened as a Four Knights. So now
I had a good excuse to crack open a book I picked up for £5.00 in a 2nd hand shop.

no title

It should have some modern games in it (my opening theory is, like my chess
news 44 years old.) Hopefully I might come across a new wrinkle to get an
interesting middle game. The introduction by Victor Bologan to a variation
of the Four Knights is brilliant. The whole book is littered with such remarks.

“Frankly speaking, it’s best to skip this chapter and leave it for
a rainy day when you are bored and have nothing else to do.”

I chuckled, serves me right. I winged the opening and did have an interesting game.

Thumbing through the book, which is quite good but a bit steep priced at £29.95.
(that’s it, your book review. It would take me a year to review it fully, watch this space.)

One line that was new to me is the Schiller/Watson variation of the Relfsson Gambit.



no title

Good Question.
Some very silly blunders due to playing far too many games at the same time and then
rushing their replies is the most obvious answer. The Cure: Cut down your game load.

For more experienced players who do take their time then one of the reasons I’ve
noticed (I too am guilty.) is having an idea and not looking at it deeply enough.
I’ve said this before, the secret of chess is NOT to have ideas and wait till your
opponent has one. The chances are it will be wrong and al you need do is prove it.

I’ll show an example with a move I mentioned above.

Augustkim - mallys7 RHP 2011



That Rg2+ Rh2+ Rg2+ draw I mentioned. Nobody is going to fall for that.

Queenmouse - Robert Huston RHP 2025 (White to play)

40. Rf1 Rg2+ 41. Kh1 Rh2+ 42. Kg1 Rg2+ draw.

The thread accompanying this blog is Thread 202864

The Planet Greenpawn

Last Post
13 Jul 25
Posts
524
Blog since
06 Jul 10
Remove Ads

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.