Debates Forum

Debates Forum

  1. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    10087
    25 Jan '19 11:05
    The new socialist wonder AOC has voted with Republicans not to fund the government. Why? It's because the bill funds ICE, something she wants to get rid of.

    That's right everyone, not only does she want to prolong federal employees from getting hired, in addition, she wants to do away with some 20,000 federal jobs.

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-only-democrat-131746048.html
  2. SubscriberSuzianne
    Misfit Queen
    Isle of Misfit Toys
    Joined
    08 Aug '03
    Moves
    35838
    25 Jan '19 11:32
    @whodey said
    The new socialist wonder AOC has voted with Republicans not to fund the government. Why? It's because the bill funds ICE, something she wants to get rid of.

    That's right everyone, not only does she want to prolong federal employees from getting hired, in addition, she wants to do away with some 20,000 federal jobs.

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-only-democrat-131746048.html
    Sounds like the same things you want, so where's your bitch?
  3. Subscriberno1marauder
    Humble and Kind
    In the Gazette
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    39949
    25 Jan '19 11:49
    @whodey said
    The new socialist wonder AOC has voted with Republicans not to fund the government. Why? It's because the bill funds ICE, something she wants to get rid of.

    That's right everyone, not only does she want to prolong federal employees from getting hired, in addition, she wants to do away with some 20,000 federal jobs.

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-only-democrat-131746048.html
    ICE didn't exist before 2003; abolishing it is a shorthand code for taking the enforcement of immigration laws in the interior of the US from the Department of Homeland Security and putting it back in the hands of the Justice Department. That wouldn't necessarily cost any jobs; something that was explained to you months ago.
  4. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    10087
    25 Jan '19 16:52
    @no1marauder said
    ICE didn't exist before 2003; abolishing it is a shorthand code for taking the enforcement of immigration laws in the interior of the US from the Department of Homeland Security and putting it back in the hands of the Justice Department. That wouldn't necessarily cost any jobs; something that was explained to you months ago.
    Would not necessarily cost jobs?

    What does that mean?

    I reckon they can be retrained to be the servants of illegals in sanctuary cities who have felony charges a mile long.
  5. Subscriberno1marauder
    Humble and Kind
    In the Gazette
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    39949
    25 Jan '19 18:331 edit
    @whodey said
    Would not necessarily cost jobs?

    What does that mean?

    I reckon they can be retrained to be the servants of illegals in sanctuary cities who have felony charges a mile long.
    I "reckon" that the duties of an agency can be moved from one Department to another without any loss of staffing.
  6. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    10087
    25 Jan '19 18:401 edit
    @no1marauder said
    I "reckon" that the duties of an agency can be moved from one Department to another without any loss of staffing.
    So keep on more nonessential personnel?

    Where does it end?

    Why not just hire everyone that wants a job?

    That way you will have a whole army of voters who vote for anyone just to grow and expand government.
  7. Subscriberno1marauder
    Humble and Kind
    In the Gazette
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    39949
    25 Jan '19 18:56
    @whodey said
    So keep on more nonessential personnel?

    Where does it end?

    Why not just hire everyone that wants a job?

    That way you will have a whole army of voters who vote for anyone just to grow and expand government.
    You think enforcing immigration laws is "nonessential"?
  8. Subscribersonhouseonline
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52850
    26 Jan '19 22:242 edits
    @no1marauder said
    You think enforcing immigration laws is "nonessential"?
    He wants NO government, that way all his buddies can fuk over citizens with toxic spills in waterways undeterred by that creepy EPA.
    Hey Woodhead, doesn't it bother you even a little you get so many thumbs down?
  9. Joined
    27 Jul '10
    Moves
    29414
    27 Jan '19 05:32
    @sonhouse said
    He wants NO government, that way all his buddies can fuk over citizens with toxic spills in waterways undeterred by that creepy EPA.
    Hey Woodhead, doesn't it bother you even a little you get so many thumbs down?
    Thumb👍 Up here.He wants smaller govt, me too. The dept of education should of course be closed. It’s budget is 70 Billion a year. Close it, build the wall, and the radicals can get rid of ICE since repelling invaders will no longer be needed. Logic. Everybody happy. The people in the dept of education will find many job opportunities, thanks to president Trump😀.
  10. Zugzwang
    Joined
    08 Jun '07
    Moves
    2120
    27 Jan '19 05:55
    @averagejoe1 said
    Thumb👍 Up here.He wants smaller govt, me too. The dept of education should of course be closed. It’s budget is 70 Billion a year. Close it, build the wall, and the radicals can get rid of ICE since repelling invaders will no longer be needed. Logic. Everybody happy. The people in the dept of education will find many job opportunities, thanks to president Trump😀.
    "The dept of education should of course be closed. It’s budget is 70 Billion a year."
    --Averagejoe1

    Can you spot the grammatical error?

    Donald Trump has said that he loves poorly educated people.
    Think of how much money could be saved by closing all educational institutions.
    Think of how more likely people would be to vote for Donald Trump.
  11. SubscriberSuzianne
    Misfit Queen
    Isle of Misfit Toys
    Joined
    08 Aug '03
    Moves
    35838
    27 Jan '19 06:27
    @averagejoe1 said
    Thumb👍 Up here.He wants smaller govt, me too. The dept of education should of course be closed. It’s budget is 70 Billion a year. Close it, build the wall, and the radicals can get rid of ICE since repelling invaders will no longer be needed. Logic. Everybody happy. The people in the dept of education will find many job opportunities, thanks to president Trump😀.
    And just F the kids. Right?

    I realize the right wants an uneducated populace, but aren't you even going to try being a little less obvious about it?
  12. SubscriberSuzianne
    Misfit Queen
    Isle of Misfit Toys
    Joined
    08 Aug '03
    Moves
    35838
    27 Jan '19 06:36
    @duchess64 said
    "The dept of education should of course be closed. It’s budget is 70 Billion a year."
    --Averagejoe1

    Can you spot the grammatical error?

    Donald Trump has said that he loves poorly educated people.
    Think of how much money could be saved by closing all educational institutions.
    Think of how more likely people would be to vote for Donald Trump.
    Apostrophes are for contractions, not possessives.

    The uneducated right just wants their kids to grow up just like them.

    When I was about 10, I saw my neighbor friend get the belt from his dad. It was over the kid bringing home an "A" on his report card. He thought his parents would be proud. His redneck dad took it upon himself to beat his kid because he thought his kid now thought he was "better than" him.
  13. Seongnam, S. Korea
    Joined
    03 Jun '17
    Moves
    19253
    28 Jan '19 11:56
    @suzianne said
    Apostrophes are for contractions, not possessives.

    The uneducated right just wants their kids to grow up just like them.

    When I was about 10, I saw my neighbor friend get the belt from his dad. It was over the kid bringing home an "A" on his report card. He thought his parents would be proud. His redneck dad took it upon himself to beat his kid because he thought his kid now thought he was "better than" him.
    I'll take...

    Shtuff that never happened for 500, Alex.

    ... But out of curiosity, where did you grow up?

    Set the scene for me.
  14. Joined
    27 Jul '10
    Moves
    29414
    28 Jan '19 22:00
    @suzianne said
    And just F the kids. Right?

    I realize the right wants an uneducated populace, but aren't you even going to try being a little less obvious about it?
    Surely you know I mean to turn education over to the States. There is not much room in these ramblings to get facetious or cynical or whatever that is. Waste of space. How bout your take on having States educate their children rather than the Federal government? Like, you'd sort of know what was going on, PTA, such as that. Nothing in Constitution about a lot of stuff our country seems to be doing.
    OK, Duchess, I am going to be watching your grammar!!! 🙂
  15. Zugzwang
    Joined
    08 Jun '07
    Moves
    2120
    28 Jan '19 23:56
    @suzianne said
    Apostrophes are for contractions, not possessives.

    The uneducated right just wants their kids to grow up just like them.

    When I was about 10, I saw my neighbor friend get the belt from his dad. It was over the kid bringing home an "A" on his report card. He thought his parents would be proud. His redneck dad took it upon himself to beat his kid because he thought his kid now thought he was "better than" him.
    "The dept of education should of course be closed. It’s budget is 70 Billion a year."
    --Averagejoe1

    "It's" means "it is". The possessive (genitive) case of "it" is "its".
    This error is common among writers in this forum.
Back to Top