Please turn on javascript in your browser to play chess.
Debates Forum

Debates Forum

  1. 01 Jul '09 23:35 / 1 edit
    'Nuff said.
  2. Standard member sh76
    Civis Americanus Sum
    01 Jul '09 23:41
    Well, I guess that settles it then.
  3. 02 Jul '09 00:14
    Originally posted by sh76
    Well, I guess that settles it then.
    Indeed.

    (silence)











    So, what do you want to talk about?
  4. 02 Jul '09 00:27
    Originally posted by scherzo
    Indeed.

    (silence)











    So, what do you want to talk about?
    Anybody up for a disscussion about Sanford and Son?
  5. Donation rwingett
    Ming the Merciless
    02 Jul '09 00:37
    Originally posted by joe beyser
    Anybody up for a disscussion about Sanford and Son?
    Do you think there's anyone named Sanford around these days who would name their kid 'Lamont?'
  6. 02 Jul '09 00:40
    Originally posted by rwingett
    Do you think there's anyone named Sanford around these days who would name their kid 'Lamont?'
    Probably not. I don't know any Gradys either.
  7. Standard member spruce112358
    Democracy Advocate
    02 Jul '09 06:43
    Originally posted by rwingett
    Do you think there's anyone named Sanford around these days who would name their kid 'Lamont?'
    Better that than 'Demond'.
  8. 02 Jul '09 16:20
    Originally posted by scherzo
    'Nuff said.
    I think its great that he enjoyed the benefits of extra-marital relations.
  9. 02 Jul '09 16:45
    Originally posted by generalissimo
    I think its great that he enjoyed the benefits of extra-marital relations.
    Unfortunately, the benefits in question are severely outweighed by moral and political costs.
  10. 02 Jul '09 17:00
    Originally posted by scherzo
    Unfortunately, the benefits in question are severely outweighed by moral and political costs.
    Only because he was a hypocrate, portraying himself as the usual family values republican.
  11. 02 Jul '09 19:05
    Originally posted by generalissimo
    Only because he was a hypocrate, portraying himself as the usual family values republican.
    If he were a Democrat, he'd be getting the same crap.
  12. 03 Jul '09 15:14
    Originally posted by scherzo
    If he were a Democrat, he'd be getting the same crap.
    which is unfortunate.

    Politicians should be jugded on their performance as governors, senators, etc, not on their private lives.
  13. 03 Jul '09 20:59
    Originally posted by generalissimo
    which is unfortunate.

    Politicians should be jugded on their performance as governors, senators, etc, not on their private lives.
    True. It's still fun to lambaste white Southern Republicans.
  14. 04 Jul '09 15:19
    Originally posted by scherzo
    True. It's still fun to lambaste white Southern Republicans.
    the worst thing is that sanford doesn't know when to shut up, he goes on to tell the media how his romantic adventures were a real love story...only making things worse.
  15. 04 Jul '09 15:37
    Originally posted by generalissimo
    the worst thing is that sanford doesn't know when to shut up, he goes on to tell the media how his romantic adventures were a real love story...only making things worse.
    Of course. He's a white Southern Republican.