No Riots, no Violence..only Revival.

This is what his wife said. You should oogle the speech of his wife erika. It does appear that violence only happens with a certain group of people that she and Charlie were not a part of.

@MickeyD said
This is what his wife said. You should oogle the speech of his wife erika. It does appear that violence only happens with a certain group of people that she and Charlie were not a part of.

@wildgrass said
Huh?

@MickeyD said
Speech in AZ right now for Kirk Celebration,
His wife actually forgave the person who killed him. I is on now 3:44PT

@MickeyD said
This is what his wife said. You should oogle the speech of his wife erika. It does appear that violence only happens with a certain group of people that she and Charlie were not a part of.

@MickeyD said
This is what his wife said. You should oogle the speech of his wife erika. It does appear that violence only happens with a certain group of people that she and Charlie were not a part of.

YouTube

@wildgrass said
Huh?

@wildgrass said
I watched some of it and gotta say it was pretty messed up and disturbing. It sounded like Steven Miller stole his speech from Joe Goebbels. It dawned on me why exactly it was so important they pin the assassin ideology on the left instead of portraying it as a random madman or other rationale, because the death of Charlie Kirk allowed them to start talking out loud in term ...[text shortened]... and when Jimmy Kimmel exposed that in joke form they had no choice but to quash it.

It's creepy.

@Rajk999 said
I think what the opening post is trying to say is that in stark contrast with the George Floyd riots, the assassination of Charlie Kirk produced nothing but peace and forgiveness. Those who supported Charlie Kirk are God-fearing people.

After the death of George Floyd, who was a career criminal, BLM and ANTIFA organised violent riots, their members and supporters killed ab ...[text shortened]... and caused over $2 Billion worth of damage. These people are evil, Godless, murderous and violent.

@wildgrass said
It's been mentioned many times, but this comparison does not make sense unless you think the government killed Charlie Kirk.

@Rajk999 said
Who killed Charlie Kirk or George Floyd is of no relevance. What is clearly demonstrated in these two situations is the nature of the people. One type is prone to violence and murder as a means of achieving their goals, while the other generally is God-fearing, forgiving and peaceful. The fact that you are blind to this fact means you side with the first group. This division in how people conduct themselves can be witnessed as well on this site.

@wildgrass said
I watched some of it and gotta say it was pretty messed up and disturbing. It sounded like Steven Miller stole his speech from Joe Goebbels. It dawned on me why exactly it was so important they pin the assassin ideology on the left instead of portraying it as a random madman or other rationale, because the death of Charlie Kirk allowed them to start talking out loud in term ...[text shortened]... and when Jimmy Kimmel exposed that in joke form they had no choice but to quash it.

It's creepy.

@wildgrass said
In what way does it make sense to protest the government if they weren't involved in Kirks death?

@Rajk999 said
It would have made no difference if Charlie Kirk died the same way George Floyd did. The response from Charlie's support base would have been the same. No rioting, no looting, no threatening to kill anyone, no burning of buildings and no destruction of property.

@MickeyD said
This is what his wife said. You should oogle the speech of his wife erika. It does appear that violence only happens with a certain group of people that she and Charlie were not a part of.