04 Mar '16 00:00>2 edits
Originally posted by Duchess64You give yourself away.
Soothfast and Vistesd are academics (whom I both respect) who have written that they
sometimes have wasted more time posting than they should because they have become
very emotionally involved in various issues (lately, Hillary Clinton vs Bernie Sanders).
I may be more affected than white men here by the thriving racism and sexism in this forum.
I may ...[text shortened]... and
so he seems strongly predisposed to disregard evidence of their lying and other wrongdoing.
From what I recall of his earlier posts, King Tiger's a very conservative American man
whose ideological sympathies seem strongly with other conservative American men and
so he seems strongly predisposed to disregard evidence of their lying and other wrongdoing
You are ungenerous. I may be a conservative (I would not define myself as very conservative) yet it does not mean I am predisposed to disregard any lying or wrongdoing. However, you are not in a position to draw a character sketch of me. You cite two other academics. Fine. Doesn't change what I say. It just shows how this can become a waste of time and jargon as your own posts adequately displays.
As an MD I spend considerable hours working at a crisis pregnancy center working often with rape victims. I actually have a tremendous soft spot in my heart for such individuals and I do not need a lecture from you on the subject. You might thank individuals like myself who leave the realm of mere academic discourse and actually put their skills to real use.
I'll straight up ask you-have you ever actually done more than talk about rape as an issue in America and actually worked in the mud with the victims of rape? If so, good for you. But don't accuse me of being predisposed to disregard evidence of lying and wrongdoing when you know almost nothing about me, Duchess64.
As for my supposed sympathies by you, I have not read these other 'conservative American men' so I could not speak to their motives or beliefs. Therefore, I have no sympathies either way at the moment.
Take your ad hominum and ego centric attacks somewhere else. They will not bother me nor elicit a like response from me, rather shame on you for your academically egregious behavior. You assumed before you had any facts. Makes me question you seriously. At least your motives. You seem to thrive at ridiculing those who 'disagree' with you. I suggest a new line of work. You could try to make allies with 'conservative American men'. Or does that whole category annoy you so much that it is impossible in your mind for any of us to be any good?