Go back
Conditional Moves

Conditional Moves

Help

R
Godless Commie

Glasgow

Joined
06 Jan 04
Moves
171019
Clock
12 Feb 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Apologies if this has been discussed before...
In paper-based correspondence chess, it is common practise to use conditional moves to save time and postage.
So, for example, you'll send 1.e4 and say 'if 1...e5 then 2.Nf3' or for obvious re-captures.
Any thoughts on whether this would be worth looking at? (I'd think it would be less than trivial to code).

bbarr
Chief Justice

Center of Contention

Joined
14 Jun 02
Moves
17381
Clock
12 Feb 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Redmike
Apologies if this has been discussed before...
In paper-based correspondence chess, it is common practise to use conditional moves to save time and postage.
So, for example, you'll send 1.e4 and say 'if 1...e5 then 2.Nf3' or for obvious re-captures.
Any thoughts on whether this would be worth looking at? (I'd think it would be less than trivial to code).
I second this suggestion.

L

Joined
08 Mar 03
Moves
13753
Clock
12 Feb 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

This would certainly save time and bandwidth.
It was discussed previously: http://www.redhotchess.com/board/showthread.php?id=7307

Cheers
Laz

S
Shut Gorohoviy!

Joined
19 May 03
Moves
14164
Clock
12 Feb 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Gets my vote 😏

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.