19 Apr 09
Hi.
This is a question for Site Admin and/or Forum Mods, but perhaps other users could also give their views...
What is your opinion on whether someone should be able or not to post objective engine analysis of a RHP user's games?
The games selected should of course be objectively chosen, and full analysis in move-by-move PGN notation should be used. This way, other users can easily check the accuracy of the analysis.
Your thoughts please 🙂
19 Apr 09
Originally posted by SquelchbelchPersonally I would love to see it but we both know that it will never happen. 🙁
Hi.
This is a question for Site Admin and/or Forum Mods, but perhaps other users could also give their views...
What is your opinion on whether someone should be able or not to post objective engine analysis of a RHP user's games?
The games selected should of course be objectively chosen, and full analysis in move-by-move PGN notation should be ...[text shortened]... This way, other users can easily check the accuracy of the analysis.
Your thoughts please 🙂
20 Apr 09
Originally posted by MctaytoThat is a new round of witch hunt.
Personally I would love to see it but we both know that it will never happen. 🙁
So if you just publish the analysis of a game witha "normal" matchup (say below 90% or so for the first three moves for real good players much lower for me) there is probably no harm done. If games come up which fit the first choices bvery much, the discussion won't center much about the contents...