05 Jul '09 11:35>1 edit
People in the other thread seemed to be getting bogged down with discussing specific questions, so I thought I'd start a new one.
Looking at the admittedly incomplete data on the various charts at the political compass website, I was struck by the fact that one quadrant of the chart seems completely unrepresented by modern political leaders. This is, alas, the quadrant in which I found I belonged: the "left libertarian" grouping: those who believe in social liberalism and economic intervention.
Almost all European governments ended up on the economic right and towards the authoritarian end of the social scale. A few, such as the Danish and Dutch administrations, leant towards the libertarian right, ie, advocating both economic and social freedom, but none of these were very far into the libertarian sector. No European government is placed left-of-centre at all (although Sweden, even as presently governed by the more right-wing of the two main parties, comes close). However, outside Europe, the chart puts Robert Mugabe on the authoritarian left, and I assume other leaders in developing countries, such as Castro and some Middle Eastern rulers, would belong in the same quadrant.
So, we have governments in all quadrants except the left-libertarian. Certainly the current situation is anomalous by historical standards - for instance, the British Labour party in the 1970s was comfortably in the left-libertarian quadrant, whereas now it's way up in the right-authoritarian. So my question is basically - what has happened to social democracy? Why does left-libertarian sentiment no longer seem to have a viable place in political discourse?
Looking at the admittedly incomplete data on the various charts at the political compass website, I was struck by the fact that one quadrant of the chart seems completely unrepresented by modern political leaders. This is, alas, the quadrant in which I found I belonged: the "left libertarian" grouping: those who believe in social liberalism and economic intervention.
Almost all European governments ended up on the economic right and towards the authoritarian end of the social scale. A few, such as the Danish and Dutch administrations, leant towards the libertarian right, ie, advocating both economic and social freedom, but none of these were very far into the libertarian sector. No European government is placed left-of-centre at all (although Sweden, even as presently governed by the more right-wing of the two main parties, comes close). However, outside Europe, the chart puts Robert Mugabe on the authoritarian left, and I assume other leaders in developing countries, such as Castro and some Middle Eastern rulers, would belong in the same quadrant.
So, we have governments in all quadrants except the left-libertarian. Certainly the current situation is anomalous by historical standards - for instance, the British Labour party in the 1970s was comfortably in the left-libertarian quadrant, whereas now it's way up in the right-authoritarian. So my question is basically - what has happened to social democracy? Why does left-libertarian sentiment no longer seem to have a viable place in political discourse?