1. Joined
    29 Dec '08
    Moves
    6788
    11 Jan '11 17:16
    It is easy to construct a game study where the side having the first move can force a win, no matter whether it is white to move or black to move. For example, white king on c3, white pawn on a7, black king on c6, black pawn on a2. Whoever has the first move can force an eventual win. Can anyone construct a game study where the side having the second move can force a win, no matter what the first move is? If it can't be done, can anyone prove it can't be done?
  2. Joined
    12 Mar '03
    Moves
    44411
    11 Jan '11 17:45
    Not sure what you're after. Consider this 'extreme' position. White wins in one no matter who is on the move.

  3. Joined
    29 Dec '08
    Moves
    6788
    11 Jan '11 18:06
    Originally posted by Mephisto2
    Not sure what you're after. Consider this 'extreme' position. White wins in one no matter who is on the move.

    [fen]rr4k1/nnb2p1p/ppp2QpB/4p3/2b5/8/5PPP/1q2NRK1 b - - 0 1[/fen]
    I am thinking "In this position, you can win as white if black moves first, and you can win as black if white moves first." In other words, in the set-up position, both sides are in fatal zugzwang, but whoever has to move first, has no choice but to make a fatal move (not necessarily a mate in 1) and removes the other side from zugswang.
  4. Standard memberSwissGambit
    Caninus Interruptus
    2014.05.01
    Joined
    11 Apr '07
    Moves
    92274
    11 Jan '11 18:18
    Originally posted by JS357
    I am thinking "In this position, you can win as white if black moves first, and you can win as black if white moves first." In other words, in the set-up position, both sides are in fatal zugzwang, but whoever has to move first, has no choice but to make a fatal move (not necessarily a mate in 1) and removes the other side from zugswang.


    Whoever has the move loses.
  5. Joined
    29 Dec '08
    Moves
    6788
    11 Jan '11 18:27
    Clean and simple. I've found it even has a name, reciprocal zugzwang or mutual zugzwang (wikipedia).
  6. Joined
    09 Dec '05
    Moves
    955
    11 Jan '11 23:431 edit
    Originally posted by SwissGambit
    [fen]8/8/8/2Kp4/3Pk3/8/8/8 b - - 0 1[/fen]

    Whoever has the move loses.
    first thing that popped into my head. A trebuchet correct?
  7. Standard memberThabtos
    I am become Death
    Joined
    23 Apr '10
    Moves
    6343
    12 Jan '11 03:15
    Originally posted by erikido
    first thing that popped into my head. A trebuchet correct?
    They updated the weaponry.

    Dvoretsky would say that the kings are on "mined squares."
  8. Joined
    27 Apr '07
    Moves
    119108
    12 Jan '11 23:59
    The whole notion of zugzwang is one of the cooler things about chess.
  9. Joined
    13 Aug '07
    Moves
    49837
    13 Jan '11 15:08
    Originally posted by erikido
    first thing that popped into my head. A trebuchet correct?
    I thought trebuchet was indeed the term, coined by Silman I think...
  10. Joined
    27 Apr '07
    Moves
    119108
    13 Jan '11 16:24
    Anyone have any good examples of real life games where it came down to "you move, you lose"?
  11. Joined
    29 Dec '08
    Moves
    6788
    13 Jan '11 16:58
    Originally posted by SmittyTime
    Anyone have any good examples of real life games where it came down to "you move, you lose"?
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zugzwang#Examples_from_games
  12. San Diego
    Joined
    23 May '07
    Moves
    2124
    14 Jan '11 01:28
    Originally posted by SmittyTime
    Anyone have any good examples of real life games where it came down to "you move, you lose"?
    Note the position after move 61. Also note that the game was won (and this position was predictable) several moves earlier. Game 3972148
  13. Joined
    25 Jan '11
    Moves
    1
    25 Jan '11 08:53
    Interesting...
    Actually aren't that easy, chess composer spend a very long time to create one chess puzzle.

    I have just saw this puzzle on: http://www.Chess9.com/index/chess-puzzle-1-24-2011
    and thought you might know the solution and help me.
  14. Aberdeen, Scotland
    Joined
    15 Apr '08
    Moves
    5787
    26 Jan '11 13:421 edit
    if you check back to the puzzle and the comments at the bottom, SwissGambit (presumably the same SwissGambit as User 355642) has solved it. Great spot. Don't think I'd ever have got that.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree