05 Dec '08 00:56>
For those who play c6 or e6 against d4 would it suprise you or get you caught off gaurd? Why is c4 played against c6 and e6 more than e4?
Originally posted by kmac27If you play 1.d4,c6 2.e4 you transposed into an e4 opening which is probably not what a d4 player wants.
For those who play c6 or e6 against d4 would it suprise you or get you caught off gaurd? Why is c4 played against c6 and e6 more than e4?
Originally posted by jnguyenMy chess ambition is to be able to start with 1.c4, 1.d4, 1. e4 and 1. f4 and play them all well. That way if someone trys 1. ... c6 or 1. ... e6 after 1. d4 then if I know the player I can choose 1. e4 or 1. c4 depending on which I think gives me the better chances against that player.
Your question is confusing to me. Are you asking white, the d4 player, if they are caught of guard by 1...e6 or c6?
I play 1. d4 almost exclusively and although I've not encountered too many 1... e6's or c6's I'd think that it's just a move order difference, no? Not sure what's the purpose behind c6/e6. Me, I'd just play 2. c4 anyway to try and stay wit ...[text shortened]... if e6
2...f5 dutch
2...d5 QGD
2...Nf6 Queen/Nimzo
if c6
2...d5 slav
2...e5 benoni
Originally posted by DeepThoughtFirst part makes a lot of sense. Definitely, play everything well if possible. A broad repertoire is a definite plus.
My chess ambition is to be able to start with 1.c4, 1.d4, 1. e4 and 1. f4 and play them all well. That way if someone trys 1. ... c6 or 1. ... e6 after 1. d4 then if I know the player I can choose 1. e4 or 1. c4 depending on which I think gives me the better chances against that player.
Originally posted by kmac27really interested in the response from the e6/c6 players out there if faced with 2.e4. As for me, I don't see the surpise factor. If black wants nimzo/queens but elects e6 instead of the more common Nf6 and then does not get the desired c4 then it makes little sense to play e6 to begin with unless black is also a French expert. So it would make sense to me that only French experts would choose e6 against 1.d4 (or caro experts choosing c6), either way there should be no surprise if white plays 2.e4
lol I don't think there is one, but a lot of players will play c6 or e6 first. So maybe it would be a good suprise in otb play. I like slav and semi slav positions, but I like to face a french or a caro kann, easier and it has suprise value.
Originally posted by jnguyen1.d4 e6 avoids the Trompowsky for one thing (1.d4 Nf6 2.Bg5).
As black, what's the advantage of playing e6 instead of Nf6 first?
Originally posted by jnguyenOn RHP I can access peoples previous games and see whether they cope better with french or queen´s pawn type games (not that I´m that likely to do it - to be honest it hardly ever happens, normally you get main line stuff off higher rated oppenents). I take your point about why not play 1. e4 to start with but it should be an arbitrary decision what the first move is unless you know your opponent will misplay after 1. c4 or they play very well after 1. e4 e5 or something. A regular opponent who normally plays something else might try it against you and you can choose what to play based on your best guess of what they´re hoping for.
really interested in the response from the e6/c6 players out there if faced with 2.e4. As for me, I don't see the surpise factor. If black wants nimzo/queens but elects e6 instead of the more common Nf6 and then does not get the desired c4 then it makes little sense to play e6 to begin with unless black is also a French expert. So it would make sense to me ...[text shortened]... ys 2.e4
if black plays e6 with no french knowledge, well then yeah, he's in for a surprise.
Originally posted by paulbuchmanfromficsThose are good points for the merits of e6 that I never thought of since I don't play the dutch and don't mind facing trompowsky as black. But realistically then, as you mentioned, e6 is only viable for French players and it would be a major risk otherwise to play it with only the intention of avoiding a few queen pawn openings.
1.d4 e6 avoids the Trompowsky for one thing (1.d4 Nf6 2.Bg5).
1.d4 e6 2.c4 f5 is a way of playing the Dutch without worrying about Anti-Dutch systems as well (1.d4 f5 2.e4/1.d4 f5 2.g4/1.d4 f5 2.Bg5/etc.).
1.d4 e6 2.c4 b6 is also a way to play the English Defence (1.d4 b6 2.e4! ... Owen's Defense).
e6 does have its goals.
Every e6 player 6 for black as well.
There is a Karpov-Miles game, however, where black took quite a beating.