here is the game Game 808366 what you guys think .
I think the king had to do much in this game!!!!!!!!!
Originally posted by Weadleyme neither.. some of the moves going back and forth. I don't see what the risk or attack was.. and I don't understand why he felt he had to resign either.. ..
I cant figure out some of those moves near the end.
I cant see why the resignation either.
Call me thick in da head.
Originally posted by dylOr 45...Kf5, when 46.Rb7 doesn't work (46...Bb7 47.cb Rd8+ -+).
What I see:
45...Kf7 (Black can only move his king)
46.Rb7 Bxb7
47.cxb7 Rb8
48.Kc6 (And there goes the c7 pawn, and the game)
However after 46.c3 (or pretty much anything else) Black only has Kg6, when Rb7 does pick up the c pawn and the game.
At first I was really surprised that Akizy lost this game. White played a dubious variation of the RL Open Defense which is known to guarantee black easy equality (i.e. the line w/ 6. Re1?!). 6. d4 is the only line which promises white any chance of the advantage. I think that part of black's problem was playing 11. . . Be6, which lost time to 12. Nc4. The book line is 11. . . f6 12. Nf3 Re8 = (de Firmian). But I think black's bigger problem was the incorrect plan beginning with 15. . . b5; 16. . . c5 simply loses a pawn. I am assuming black was trying to undouble his pawns and develop his c8 bishop, but after 11. . . f6, however, the e6 knight has a fine post on g5, and white can develop his bishop normally (to f5 or g4 or or even e6).
The point is: in examining this game, and trying to figure out what went wrong, no one else noticed the move(s) which put black in a less-than-desirable position relatively early in the game. I am finding out more and more that most players on this site are allergic to opening theory. . .
But it's really easy to "return the compliment" when your opponent plays moves which you know are bad, especially in the opening. Sometimes, when this happens, I immediately start trying to refute my opponent's moves instead of formulating a coherent strategy. Maybe this is the point of playing an opening sideline, even though it is bad. For example, in this game http://www.redhotpawn.com/core/playchess.php?gameid=1062567, black (me) is returning the compliment after white's (weak) 4. Bg5. 4. . . Ne4 is good; 5. Bh4 Nxc3 6. bxc3 dxc4 7. e3 Be6 and black is obviously better. Or white could capture on e4, but after 5. . . dxe4 6. Qc2 Be6 white's bishop on g5 is stupid and white won't be able to develop his kingside normally due to the annoying black pawn on e4. I think that 4. . . Bg7 is playable but after 5. e3?! Ne4!? I'm entering into an unclear position which I don't like. I probably should have played 5. . . c6, which was my initial (and more consistent) idea.