1 edit
Here's a 15-5 Najdorf game that I just finished, I think my play was quite sound, and it involved a pretty sweet attack too. 🙂
[Event "ICC"]
[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
[Date "2008.03.01"]
[White "CMSSacrifice"]
[Black "postalite"]
[Result ""]
[TimeControl "900+5"]
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6
6. Be3 e6 7. Qd2 Be7 8. O-O-O O-O 9. f3 Nbd7 10. g4 Ne5
11. Be2 h6 12. h4 Nfd7 13. g5 h5 14. f4 Ng4 15. Bxg4 hxg4
16. h5 Nc5 17. h6 g6 18. h7+ Kh8 19. Nb3 Nxb3+ 20. axb3 b5
21. Bd4+ f6 22. gxf6 Bxf6 23. Bxf6+ Qxf6 24. Qxd6 Qxf4+ 25. Qxf4 Rxf4 26. Rd8+
1-0
Originally posted by cmsMasterNice! Although, I think you could have probably gotten an even stronger attack if g5 was played instead of Be2. Anyway, this is why I'm uncertain about playing such risky openings against stronger players.
Here's a 15-5 Najdorf game that I just finished, I think my play was quite sound, and it involved a pretty sweet attack too. 🙂
[Event "ICC"]
[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
[Date "2008.03.01"]
[White "CMSSacrifice"]
[Black "postalite"]
[Result ""]
[TimeControl "900+5"]
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6
6. Be3 e6 7. Qd2 Be7 8. ...[text shortened]... . Bd4+ f6 22. gxf6 Bxf6 23. Bxf6+ Qxf6 24. Qxd6 Qxf4+ 25. Qxf4 Rxf4 26. Rd8+
1-0