Go back
Best Player Collections

Best Player Collections

Only Chess

G

USA

Joined
14 Apr 03
Moves
148
Clock
19 Apr 03
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Which grandmaster do you most
enjoy studying, and which collection of his games would
you recommend? I have a book
by chess afficionado Betty Roberts who asked this question to a number of the world's best players, and I noticed that the names cited most
often were
Nimzowitsch, Alekhine and Capablanca. Fischer and Tal were
mentioned a couple times as well. I bought Capablanca's Best Chess
Endings by Chernev several years ago, but have never worked through it. It
lwas a compelling buy to me at the time because (i) it is by
Chernev, who is better at making chess accessible to low
rated players like me, (ii) it focuses on the end game,
on which I continue to need work, and (iii) despite
the book's title, it includes 60 complete and
well-annotated games of Capa. Any other recommendations? Thanks.

l
Into the Breach!

San Francisco

Joined
24 Feb 03
Moves
3420
Clock
19 Apr 03
Vote Up
Vote Down

For improvement: I think you already have an excellent resource in the Capablanca. His style is so lucid that you're bound to learn something, and he was especially strong in areas (positional play, endgame) where most of us could use help.

Also, I found this while looking for something else - it's an online book targeted at lower-level players covering the strong 1924 New York International chess tournament. (Em. Lasker won, beating out Capablanca and Alekhine). Someone put a huge amount of work into this thing, annotating every game:
http://www.chessbaseusa.com/NY1924/ny1924.htm

For entertainment: Bronstein - "The Sorcerer's Apprentice"
I love playing through Bronstein games as a chess fan because he always traded in the strange and unexpected, and was willing to take some risks. You have to admire a man who sits down as white against Tal (one of the greatest combinative players ever) and plays a King's Gambit (Riga, 1968)...! 😲

L

Joined
08 Mar 03
Moves
13753
Clock
19 Apr 03
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by GarnetNBlack
Which grandmaster do you most
enjoy studying, and which collection of his games would
you recommend? I have a book
by chess afficionado Betty Roberts who asked this question to a number of the world's best players, and I noticed th ...[text shortened]...
well-annotated games of Capa. Any other recommendations? Thanks.
If you can get hold if, "The Life and Games of Mikail Tal" is an enjoyable read.

Tal performs a self-interview throughout the book, so not only do you get some great annotated games, you also learn of the history behind them. Such as a game he played against Benko:

"Yes, of course! In the third cycle, when we sat down at the board Benko, who had earlier suspected me of hypnotising him, took out of his pocket a pair of dark glasses and put them on. This 'inovation', like any that the opponent knows about before hand, was met by a 'counter-stroke'. I had borrowed some enormous dark glasses from Petrosian, and following Benko I straight away put them on. Not only the spectators laughed, as well as the other participants and controllers, but also Benko himself. Unlike me, however, he did not remove his glasses until as late as the twentieth move, by which time his position was already hopeless."

You get the idea, good chess and some great stories - not sure if it is still in print though.

G

USA

Joined
14 Apr 03
Moves
148
Clock
20 Apr 03
Vote Up
Vote Down

Thanks for posting that link to Steve Lopez's analysis of those games. Some years ago, I avidly read his T-Notes columns, which discuss how to use/study games with ChessBase. I need to take a look at his writing again.

GNB

G

USA

Joined
14 Apr 03
Moves
148
Clock
20 Apr 03
Vote Up
Vote Down

Hi, Laz,

Thanks for suggesting the Tal book; it seems like a lot of people are fans of his playing style.

GNB

L

Joined
08 Mar 03
Moves
13753
Clock
20 Apr 03
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by GarnetNBlack
Hi, Laz,

Thanks for suggesting the Tal book; it seems like a lot of people are fans of his playing style.

GNB
I also got hold of a "Fishcer's 60 memorable games" a book often mentioned (had it shipped over from the USA actually).

Again nice book (but out of print). Most of the commentary is done by Larry Evans not Fischer himself, if I re-call correctly - not bad though. The games themselves are the books main selling point!

I am currently working through Bronstein's "The Sorcerer's Apprentice".
Another good book and very instructive - Bronstein's style is to try and get you to think "properly" about the games...

l
Into the Breach!

San Francisco

Joined
24 Feb 03
Moves
3420
Clock
20 Apr 03
Vote Up
Vote Down

There's also a Batsford edition of the Fischer book, which Fischer held a press conference to denounce...

tonytiger41

Joined
09 Aug 01
Moves
54191
Clock
20 Apr 03
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by GarnetNBlack
Which grandmaster do you most
enjoy studying, and which collection of his games would
you recommend? I have a book
by chess afficionado Betty Roberts who asked this question to a number of the world's best players, and I noticed that the names cited most
often were
Nimzowitsch, Alekhine and Capablanca. Fischer and Tal were
mentioned a couple time ...[text shortened]... e, it includes 60 complete and
well-annotated games of Capa. Any other recommendations? Thanks.
Just noticed the three volume set containing Botvinnik's games. I find anything annotated by Botvinnik to be extremely instructional. Years ago when I studied chess, the only other game collection I went over was Karpov's games.
Tiger

w

Joined
06 May 03
Moves
1126
Clock
18 May 03
Vote Up
Vote Down

What about Morphy, Lasker or other players ?

I was told to start with Morphy, but it seems to me that his openings are not what I am playing now...

Do you guys choose games specific to the opening, or based on his chess style and personality ?

Thanks a lot 😀

l
Into the Breach!

San Francisco

Joined
24 Feb 03
Moves
3420
Clock
18 May 03
Vote Up
Vote Down

I saw an interview w/ Spassky where he said his trainer deliberately looked for games that did NOT have current openings - the idea was to focus on middle game training and not let opening "theory" (which is always changing anyway) distract from the lesson...

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.