Originally posted by Ramned Get ceders in here to discuss what he likes about it.
Or tmetzler...
What attracted me was the similarity to the Dutch Defence with black. I have played the Dutch for quite a while now, and it suits me very well, so I thought I'd give the Bird a try, too. Another advantage is that very likely your opponent won't be very familiar with it.
Originally posted by dzhafner If ...e5 ...d6, don't take the second gambit pawn. Unless, of course, you expect divine intervention
Ehm....
In the From countergambit, white can equalise or win but you should play very carefully.
In the Yugoslavian small encyclopaedia (ECO A02), the very few variations they give are = or complex.
I played it sometimes (e.g. Lasker variation 1. f4 e5 2. fxe5 d6 3. exd6 Bxd6 4. Nf3 g5) and I managed to get good results.
Nevertheless, it's very special and difficult.
When I play f4, I expect rather d5 and a kind of reversed Dutch defense.
After 1. ... e5, when I'm lazy, I hit directly 2. e5 and transpose to the King's gambit.
Originally posted by ivan2908 What is exactly the point and what are the plusses of it ?
if your still interested in the bird ivan, i have compiled over 2,500 games in an archive that all contain the bird opening. with games from fischer, darkthought vs shredder, novikov, malaniuk, danielson, and bird himself
if your interested, let me know and i'll pop it onto my website and you'll have a rather large, and strong bird system database.
Originally posted by Adorea if your still interested in the bird ivan, i have compiled over 2,500 games in an archive that all contain the bird opening. with games from fischer, darkthought vs shredder, novikov, malaniuk, danielson, and bird himself
if your interested, let me know and i'll pop it onto my website and you'll have a rather large, and strong bird system database.