1. Joined
    10 May '09
    Moves
    13341
    11 Jun '13 23:28
    You ever have a game where your opponent blunders so bad you just want to say, "No, take that move back"? I'm sure my esteemed opponent slapped his head when he saw this. 🙂

  2. Standard memberSwissGambit
    Caninus Interruptus
    2014.05.01
    Joined
    11 Apr '07
    Moves
    92274
    12 Jun '13 02:32
    Originally posted by USArmyParatrooper
    You ever have a game where your opponent blunders so bad you just want to say, "No, take that move back"? I'm sure my esteemed opponent slapped his head when he saw this. 🙂

    [pgn]
    [Event "Challenge"]
    [Site "http://www.redhotpawn.com"]
    [Date "2013.06.06"]
    [EndDate "2013.06.09"]
    [Round "?"]
    [White "USArmyParatrooper"]
    [Black "littlecritter" ...[text shortened]... e4 c5 2. Ng1f3 d5 3. exd5 Qd8xd5 4. Nb1c3 Qd5c6 5. Bf1b5 1-0[/pgn]
    No, because I need the points back after my horrific blunders in the other games.
  3. Standard memberSwissGambit
    Caninus Interruptus
    2014.05.01
    Joined
    11 Apr '07
    Moves
    92274
    12 Jun '13 02:43
    Originally posted by USArmyParatrooper
    You ever have a game where your opponent blunders so bad you just want to say, "No, take that move back"? I'm sure my esteemed opponent slapped his head when he saw this. 🙂

    [pgn]
    [Event "Challenge"]
    [Site "http://www.redhotpawn.com"]
    [Date "2013.06.06"]
    [EndDate "2013.06.09"]
    [Round "?"]
    [White "USArmyParatrooper"]
    [Black "littlecritter" ...[text shortened]... e4 c5 2. Ng1f3 d5 3. exd5 Qd8xd5 4. Nb1c3 Qd5c6 5. Bf1b5 1-0[/pgn]
    Reminds me of a twist on the harassment of a Q on c6.

    First google hit.

  4. Joined
    10 May '09
    Moves
    13341
    12 Jun '13 02:50
    Why give up Bishop pair and double pawns with 6. d3?

    Why no royal fork the first time?
  5. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    12 Jun '13 04:46
    Originally posted by USArmyParatrooper
    Why give up Bishop pair and double pawns with 6. d3?

    Why no royal fork the first time?
    He probablly did not see it the first time.

    The Instructor
  6. Standard memberSwissGambit
    Caninus Interruptus
    2014.05.01
    Joined
    11 Apr '07
    Moves
    92274
    12 Jun '13 08:06
    Originally posted by USArmyParatrooper
    Why give up Bishop pair and double pawns with 6. d3?

    Why no royal fork the first time?
    Doubled pawns that control central squares are fine.

    White just missed the first Nc7+. Clearly, from the way the game ended, he was capable of seeing it. Just carelessness.
  7. Standard membervivify
    rain
    Joined
    08 Mar '11
    Moves
    12351
    12 Jun '13 11:441 edit
    One of my Chess.com games:

  8. Donationketchuplover
    Isolated Pawn
    Wisconsin USA
    Joined
    09 Dec '01
    Moves
    71169
    12 Jun '13 12:14
    Originally posted by vivify
    One of my Chess.com games:

    [pgn][Date "????.??.??"]
    [Result "*"]
    [FEN "rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1"]

    1.d3 d5 2.b3 d4 3.g3 Qd5 { I actually broke the rule about taking the queen out early. The attack on the H square seemed worth it, since it would stifle white's development a bit. } 4.f3 e5 5.Bg2 Bb4+ 6.c3 dxc3 7.e4 { And ...[text shortened]... d2# { All this destruction on white, and I didn't lose a single piece. }
    *[/pgn]
    9...Qe1#
  9. Standard memberSwissGambit
    Caninus Interruptus
    2014.05.01
    Joined
    11 Apr '07
    Moves
    92274
    12 Jun '13 14:371 edit
    Originally posted by vivify
    One of my Chess.com games:

    [pgn][Date "????.??.??"]
    [Result "*"]
    [FEN "rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1"]

    1.d3 d5 2.b3 d4 3.g3 Qd5 { I actually broke the rule about taking the queen out early. The attack on the H square seemed worth it, since it would stifle white's development a bit. } 4.f3 e5 5.Bg2 Bb4+ 6.c3 dxc3 7.e4 { And d2# { All this destruction on white, and I didn't lose a single piece. }
    *[/pgn]
    White's development needn't be stifled if he plays 4.Nf3.
  10. Standard membervivify
    rain
    Joined
    08 Mar '11
    Moves
    12351
    12 Jun '13 17:44
    Originally posted by SwissGambit
    White's development needn't be stifled if he plays 4.Nf3.
    Good point. I'll remember not to take the Queen out early anytime soon.

    And Ketchup, good eye. I miss things so easily when I'm mindful of time.
  11. Donationketchuplover
    Isolated Pawn
    Wisconsin USA
    Joined
    09 Dec '01
    Moves
    71169
    12 Jun '13 23:36
    Originally posted by vivify
    Good point. I'll remember not to take the Queen out early anytime soon.

    And Ketchup, good eye. I miss things so easily when I'm mindful of time.
    What was the time control? Kibitzer sight should always be 20/20
  12. Standard membervivify
    rain
    Joined
    08 Mar '11
    Moves
    12351
    14 Jun '13 00:09
    The time control was a shamefully long 10/0. An eternity to three-minute players. So really, there was no good excuse for me to miss the mate in 9. I just suck.
  13. SubscriberPaul Leggett
    Chess Librarian
    The Stacks
    Joined
    21 Aug '09
    Moves
    113550
    14 Jun '13 00:53
    Originally posted by USArmyParatrooper
    You ever have a game where your opponent blunders so bad you just want to say, "No, take that move back"? I'm sure my esteemed opponent slapped his head when he saw this. 🙂

    [pgn]
    [Event "Challenge"]
    [Site "http://www.redhotpawn.com"]
    [Date "2013.06.06"]
    [EndDate "2013.06.09"]
    [Round "?"]
    [White "USArmyParatrooper"]
    [Black "littlecritter" ...[text shortened]... e4 c5 2. Ng1f3 d5 3. exd5 Qd8xd5 4. Nb1c3 Qd5c6 5. Bf1b5 1-0[/pgn]
    I have from both sides. When playing OTB, I hate winning by default simply because I am sitting on the other side, and I hate giving someone a gift when they did not deserve it. I feel that such results demonstrate the truth of the human condition more than the truth of chess.

    I can only play a finite and limited number of OTB games, and I hate wasting such opportunities.

    In this format I am not so concerned. Since we can use books and database during our game, I don't have as much personally invested in it, and I can always immediately start another game.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree