C. looses game as white in damiano defence (# in 4

for some reason this computers opening book has a blunder in it!:

[Event "Computer chess game"]
[Site "YOUR-S8ETALCMIN"]
[Date "2005.05.14"]
[Round "-"]
[White "GNUChess"]
[Black "bob"]
[Result "0-1"]
[TimeControl "40/300"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 f6? 3. Nxe5 Qe7 4. Qh5+? g6 5. Nxg6 Qxe4+ 6. Be2 Qxg6 7. O-O
Ne7 8. d4 d5 9. Nc3 c6 10. Qh4 Nf5 11. Qh3 Kd8 12. Qd3 Rg8 13. g3 Nd6 14.
Bf4 Bf5 15. Qd2 Bxc2 16. Rac1 Bf5 17. Rfe1 Nd7 18. Qd1 Bg4 19. Qb3 Bxe2 20.
Rxe2 Nb6 21. Qb4 Nf5 22. Qa5 Nxd4 23. Be3 Nxe2+ 24. Nxe2 c5 25. Bxc5 Bxc5
26. Qxc5 Qe4 27. Nc3 Qe6 28. Rd1 Rg5 29. h4 Re5 30. Qf8+ Kd7 31. Qh6 Qf5
32. b4 Rc8 33. Qd2 Qf3 34. Rc1 Na4 35. Nxa4 Re2 36. Nb6+ axb6 37. Qxe2
Rxc1+ 38. Qf1 Rxf1+ 39. Kxf1 d4 40. Ke1 d3 41. Kd2 Qe2+ 42. Kc3 d2 43. Kd4
d1=Q+ 44. Kc3 Qdd3#
{Black mates} 0-1

final position:

after the downright blunder Qh5 (for some reason white values my g pawn more than his nite) mate is probably forced in no more than 60 moves (i wonder how long it would take to figure out exactly when mate can be forced with best play)

why are you posting all this garbage?

Originally posted by the jitty slitter
why are you posting all this garbage?

I am aware of that Sherlock. Just observing this fellows post after post of... well anyhow.

The problem is the proliferation of threads about Damiano's defence which are pushing more interesting ones down into obscurity. Please keep all this stuff in one thread. That way we can find threads that are about other things.

well said deep thought, although it isnt difficult to go back a page

and thanks for defending me revello, and sorry for wasting space with kaspies games, etc.