1. Standard memberRamned
    The Rams
    Joined
    04 Sep '06
    Moves
    13491
    24 Aug '07 11:43
    - didn't push the c pawn to support d pawn (missed rook c1 after castle)

    - Move 18 - Nc5 caused uncoordination. 19 should've played Bb6.

    - Attack weak space - f6.

    These are the key mistakes I made. Thanks for the good analysis fellas. I'd kinda like to see if Korch can see any further ones or if Maris made any.
  2. Standard memberKorch
    Chess Warrior
    Riga
    Joined
    05 Jan '05
    Moves
    24932
    24 Aug '07 16:235 edits
    After 9.Bb5?! (instead of 9.0-0 with slightly better position) Kf8? (instead of simple 9...Bd7 with equal position) your position was better until 19.Nb6? - after that your position was lost. You should have play 19.Bb6 Qf8 (black has nothing better) 20.Nxe5!! axb5 21.0-0 with strong attack for piece.

    Also you could play 18.d6 Nc6 19.0-0 with advantage (instead of 18.Nc4).
  3. Joined
    18 Apr '06
    Moves
    31699
    24 Aug '07 16:47
    Originally posted by Korch
    I have seen IM using this opening.
    Who is this IM?
  4. Standard memberKorch
    Chess Warrior
    Riga
    Joined
    05 Jan '05
    Moves
    24932
    24 Aug '07 17:09
    Originally posted by badivan1
    Who is this IM?
    Ilmars Starostits

    http://www.fide.com/ratings/card.phtml?event=11600748
  5. Standard memberRamned
    The Rams
    Joined
    04 Sep '06
    Moves
    13491
    24 Aug '07 17:15
    Originally posted by Korch
    After 9.Bb5?! (instead of 9.0-0 with slightly better position) Kf8? (instead of simple 9...Bd7 with equal position) your position was better until 19.Nb6? - after that your position was lost. You should have play 19.Bb6 Qf8 (black has nothing better) 20.Nxe5!! axb5 21.0-0 with strong attack for piece.

    Also you could play 18.d6 Nc6 19.0-0 with advantage (instead of 18.Nc4).
    Thanks for that. I'm rather suprised I kept a winning position to move 19. That was an outward blunder 🙁
  6. Standard memberKorch
    Chess Warrior
    Riga
    Joined
    05 Jan '05
    Moves
    24932
    24 Aug '07 17:24
    Originally posted by Ramned
    Thanks for that. I'm rather suprised I kept a winning position to move 19. That was an outward blunder 🙁
    "with strong attack" does not means "winning position" - don`t forget you had to sacrifice piece for that attack.
  7. Standard memberRamned
    The Rams
    Joined
    04 Sep '06
    Moves
    13491
    24 Aug '07 17:34
    Originally posted by Korch
    "with strong attack" does not means "winning position" - don`t forget you had to sacrifice piece for that attack.
    what i meant was, i had the better position to move 19 according to you, which suprises me
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree