Originally posted by Zelnick Why isn't it allowed?
The straightfoward answer is "that's the rules". 🙂 But if you're wondering why the rule was chosen, it's probably because castiling was introduced (just like pawns moving two squares) to provide a short cut way of doing what many players did using multiple moves. i.e. prior to the ability to castle, players artificially castled by letting the rook out and then walking the king over to the side, using several moves to do so. Castling was seen as a pragmatic addition to the rules.
However, such "short cut rules" should never provide new possibilities. If a king was in checkmate prior to the rule, then it should be checkmate with the new rule in place. But this would not always be the case if the king could castle out of check. Hence it's not allowed.
Checkmate before and after the castling rule was introduced.
Originally posted by Zelnick Why isn't it allowed?
King: No king should have to walk so much.
Jester: I know, let's save all this kludgy business with the king walking around the rook and invent this move. Lets call if going into the, uh, castle.
...later
Jester: Hah! I castled out of mate!
King: Oh no you didn't.
Bonk!
...later
Jester (to the court): Let it be known that in this castle, you can't castle out of mate, any more than I could castle out of that bonk!
Originally posted by Varenka Here's another example:
[fen]8/8/8/7r/K6q/7r/1P5k/8[/fen]
Checkmate prior to pawns being able to move two moves, but not afterwards.
My choice of words was indeed incorrect. Maybe there was an attempt to minimise new possibilities?! Is that more accurate?!
I think it was just to help get the King to safety as fast as possible. The Q and B had just had their powers greatly augmented and the game was going through a big period of change.