Originally posted by CenterNutI'm not going to respond to you anymore because you obviously don't intend to read what I or anyone has to say and just want to run your mouth. I already said to read my analysis but obviously you have a better idea: why not I don't and just talk rubbish.
You wanted to show this game at about move six before I called you what I did. Reason I called you that was because of what you did, it was deleted from the forum because you was out of order. Now you make excuses about you wanted to lockup the queenside well why on earth did you post the game in the forum suggesting I was cheating.
The more you make excu ...[text shortened]... funnny how you can calculate moves for that but cant predict what im going to do with 2 pawns.
Originally posted by WeadleyCenterNut had been calling everyone who used databases a cheater since god knows when, but during the game, I posted in the forums asking people to check if he was using an engine. It was a pretty stupid thing to do because it was in the opening and I was just paranoid. Beyond that its all in the game.
Im confused.
Who called who a cheater first?
Who posted the game in the forums asking if his opponent was cheating.
We need a clear timeline here.