1. Standard memberSpacetime
    Not material
    The Universe
    Joined
    30 Jun '06
    Moves
    6775
    10 Mar '07 17:23
    Game 2726194

    I was happy with this game, so I thought I would share it.

    Thanks for any comments
  2. washington
    Joined
    18 Dec '05
    Moves
    47023
    10 Mar '07 18:34
    nice to see you again space time when i drop my gameload i'm ready for another game i feel i am way stronger and more of a challenge for you. great game though i always play Bc5 instead to avoid the attack but when i play Nf6 they always move their bishop to a4 after all the exchanges just makes it too hard on me.
  3. Joined
    14 Feb '07
    Moves
    377
    10 Mar '07 18:41
    Originally posted by Spacetime
    Game 2726194

    I was happy with this game, so I thought I would share it.

    Thanks for any comments
    Very good counter attack against the fried liver!
  4. Standard memberSpacetime
    Not material
    The Universe
    Joined
    30 Jun '06
    Moves
    6775
    10 Mar '07 18:41
    Thanks Kmac, Sounds good. You were always a challenge, but you seem to be getting stronger by the day...

    PM me when you are ready to play.

    BTW - I am a Najdorf player now, you rubbed off on me.
  5. Standard memberSpacetime
    Not material
    The Universe
    Joined
    30 Jun '06
    Moves
    6775
    10 Mar '07 18:421 edit
    Reply to Ian

    Thanks! I was quite pleased with the way it turned out.
  6. Standard memberKorch
    Chess Warrior
    Riga
    Joined
    05 Jan '05
    Moves
    24932
    10 Mar '07 18:48
    Nice game - black exploited opponents mistakes very well.
  7. Joined
    25 Sep '05
    Moves
    5899
    10 Mar '07 19:51
    Originally posted by Ian Coetzee
    Very good counter attack against the fried liver!
    I don't think this game officially became the fried liver as there was no sac against f7. I could be wrong though. The other components were very similar to the fried liver, but were simply a two knights variation that could have transposed to the fried liver attack.

    Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
  8. Joined
    05 Feb '07
    Moves
    777
    10 Mar '07 21:26
    15 d3?? allowing Bxh2 and then Ng4 blew it for white
  9. Joined
    21 Feb '06
    Moves
    6500
    11 Mar '07 15:441 edit
    sorry to say this but I dont think your attack was that great.


    1) after 13. 0-0 I dont think black has much to show for his gambit.
    2) had 15. d4! been played of d3, white would not have lost a tempo.
    3) 21. Bxg3?!
    4) after 22. Rxd4 the very simple Qe1! is good for white.
  10. Ede, Netherlands
    Joined
    07 Feb '07
    Moves
    661
    11 Mar '07 16:41
    Originally posted by Chesswick
    I don't think this game officially became the fried liver as there was no sac against f7. I could be wrong though. The other components were very similar to the fried liver, but were simply a two knights variation that could have transposed to the fried liver attack.

    Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
    You are right, it is only a fried liver after 5...Nxd5? 6. Nxf7!?
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree