Go back
Check out this knight!

Check out this knight!

Only Chess

Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
What fascinates me is the apparently automated process that edited his post. The "feck" euphemism could have been substituted by a person, but not the "quote reply my thing and you'll see where I had the thing input".

Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
you should read this post very closely rubberboy...I think you said some things that you dind't mean to...😉

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by tomtom232
you should read this post very closely rubberboy...I think you said some things that you dind't mean to...😉
won't be the first time I've been banned 😉
and what was with the sudden dual interest in the alliteration in my profile?
jeez.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rubberjaw30
won't be the first time I've been banned 😉
and what was with the sudden dual interest in the alliteration in my profile?
jeez.
I was just looking and I saw it....and I had just been thinking about it so I pm'd you.

Edit: I wasn't talking about the "feck you" part I was talking about the last three lines...read them as if somebody else posted them and you will see what I mean.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by tomtom232
I was just looking and I saw it....and I had just been thinking about it so I pm'd you.

Edit: I wasn't talking about the "feck you" part I was talking about the last three lines...read them as if somebody else posted them and you will see what I mean.
wow, I had to laugh out loud...
that's pretty damn funny!
I think I'll leave it 😏

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

"Refain from improper language. We know what you meant by (*) you" - Forum Moderator

man, they're getting good at this whole code-breaking business!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rubberjaw30
"Refain from improper language. We know what you meant by * you" - Forum Moderator

man, they're getting good at this whole code-breaking business!
LOL!! I think that they should just give it up...there not catching most of it because noone cares to report it.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by tomtom232
LOL!! I think that they should just give it up...there not catching most of it because noone cares to report it.
someone cared enough cared enough to report the "fe..." word...
ooooooooh
scary.

Vote Up
Vote Down

This thread is a prime example why non-subscribers should not be allowed to post in the forums...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Crowley
This thread is a prime example why non-subscribers should not be allowed to post in the forums...
that post is a prime example why you should not be allowed to post in the forums...😕

Vote Up
Vote Down

I had these knights in an OTB game last friday:

1. d4 d5
2. Bf4 e6
3. e3 c5
4. c3 Nc6
5. Nd2 Nf6
6. Ngf3 Nh5
7. Bg5 Be7
8. Bxe7 Qxe7
9. Bb5 O-O
10. Bxc6 bxc6

Alot of knight moves about to come now:

11. Ne5 Nf6
12. Nb3 c4
13. Nc5 Nd7!?
14. Nxc6 Qg5
15. Nxd7 Qxg2
16. Ne7+ Kh8
17. Nxf8 Qxh1+
18. Ke2?! (18. Kd2! forces Qxd1+ with a won endgame for white) Qe4?! (loses a piece rather than facing a lost endgame after Qxd1+)
19. Nxc8 Rxc8
20. Nd7 +-