26 Sep 13
Originally posted by 64squaresofpain3... c6 is a very dodgy move because he's just losing more and more tempi. He probably could argue that it supports the push to d5 but I doubt it's worth it considering ti blocks the knight's natural square.
A recent game with white
Black played a couple of questionable moves, but the real clanger was move 17
[pgn][Event "Open invite"] [Site "http://www.redhotpawn.com"] [Date "2013.09.18"] [EndDate "2013.09.26"] [Round "?"] [White "64squaresofpain"] [Black "Dizzie"] [WhiteRating "1569"] [BlackRating "1355"] [WhiteElo "1569"] [BlackElo "1355"] [Result ...[text shortened]... while...
Maybe because the majority of my opponents are now at the same level as me, or higher
26 Sep 13
Originally posted by TygertYou must not have read about this line or your massive IQ would have remembered it is called the semi slav.
3... c6 is a very dodgy move because he's just losing more and more tempi. He probably could argue that it supports the push to d5 but I doubt it's worth it considering ti blocks the knight's natural square.
- Joined
- 12 Nov 06
- Moves
- 74414
26 Sep 13
1 edit
Originally posted by MISTER CHESSIt's not a semi-slav, it does have some resemblance to it and could possibly transpose, but you cannot call that a semi-slav. 3..c6 is dodgy because it allows 4.e4 and white has an opening advantage.
You must not have read about this line or your massive IQ would have remembered it is called the semi slav.
26 Sep 13
1 edit
Originally posted by KnightStalker47Yes, but the point is after d5 is played it is a semi slav. He was worried about blocking the knight and losing a tempo, just because he got the judgement right but for the wrong reasons doesn't mean he needs no correction. Especially when he has such an inflated sense of himself.
It's not a semi-slav, it does have some resemblance to it and could possibly transpose, but you cannot call that a semi-slav. 3..c6 is dodgy because it allows 4.e4 and white has an opening advantage.
Edit: Thank you for pointing that out though, My comment may have been misleading to others.
27 Sep 13
Originally posted by MISTER CHESSLook dude, I'm really not interested in anything you have to say. This is a chess forum open to discussion and is not a place for trolls. I come here for analysis and would appreciate it if you did not talk to me.
You must not have read about this line or your massive IQ would have remembered it is called the semi slav.
27 Sep 13
Originally posted by MISTER CHESSWhether it's a semi-slav or not, it was a bad move. End of story.
Yes, but the point is after d5 is played it is a semi slav. He was worried about blocking the knight and losing a tempo, just because he got the judgement right but for the wrong reasons doesn't mean he needs no correction. Especially when he has such an inflated sense of himself.
Edit: Thank you for pointing that out though, My comment may have been misleading to others.
27 Sep 13
2 edits
Originally posted by TygertLook boy, I made those comments ages ago. I would thrash you in a game after playing c6 so go back to your IQ test and figure out what you did wrong to only score a measly 160.
Whether it's a semi-slav or not, it was a bad move. End of story.
Pointing out a bad move for ignorant reasons is more lucky than good and someone who sucks at chess like yourself shouldn't be pointing out mistakes to another person who is better than you at chess, like 64squares.
08 Oct 13
Originally posted by MISTER CHESSLOL! Good for you, Mister. Good for you.
Here is an original mate in under 20 instead of a pattern everybody knows and has probably appeared in this thread multiple times
[pgn]1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Bd3 c5 6. c3 Qb6 7. Ne2 cxd4 8. cxd4 Nc6 9. Nf3 Bb4+ {? giving me tempi} 10. Bd2 Bxd2+ {?? even worse than the last move. getting rid of my bad bishop for me while ...[text shortened]... to swing onto the h file} Kg8 15. Qd3 f5 16. Qh3 Re8 17. Nf4 Kf8 18. Ng6+ Kg8 19. Qh7# 1-0[/pgn]
