I was convinced 6. e5 was a blunder, and only after 9. Ngxe2 I looked into chess base and found out it was genuine variation!
Even more, Short defeated Miles on tournament in London 1976 with that!
On chessgames.com one of kibitzers suggested 11...g5, and I took it, it looked I trapped the Bishop.
But no.
Instead of Nxc7+, Re4 gave more fight.
Originally posted by vanderveldeVery entertaining game.
I was convinced 6. e5 was a blunder, and only after 9. Ngxe2 I looked into chess base and found out it was genuine variation!
Even more, Short defeated Miles on tournament in London 1976 with that!
On chessgames.com one of kibitzers suggested 11...g5, and I took it, it looked I trapped the Bishop.
But no.
Instead of Nxc7+, Re4 gave more fight.
Nigel Short commented on chessgames.com that his game in this line was not against Tony MIles.
Originally posted by greenpawn34A lot of material to sacrifice for an attack. This was a bit too deep for me. Interesting though.
I sat there working out a lovely win v vandervelde
then as it got closer to the knock out blow...I'm White.
[pgn]
1. e4 g6 2. d4 d6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. Bc4 Nf6 5. Qe2 Nc6 6. e5 Nxd4 {I have a tremendous record with this line OTB. The kill joys prefer 6...Ng4.} 7. exf6 Nxe2 8. fxg7 Rg8 9. Ngxe2 Rxg7 10. Bh6 Rg8 11. O-O-O g5 {Trying to the trap the Bisho ...[text shortened]... carried on.} 24... Kg8 25. Rxg7+ Kxg7 {And bishop+ wins the Queen.} 26. Bh6+ Kxf6 {0-1.} [/pgn]