Did David Tebb really beat Casparov??

I saw a few weeks ago a thread bby David Tebb that said that he beat Casparov. I would like to know if he really did or was it just a lie.

Originally posted by Sum of All Fears
I saw a few weeks ago a thread bby David Tebb that said that he beat Casparov. I would like to know if he really did or was it just a lie.

I can understand why some people are sceptical, but I promise that I did beat Kasparov, and here's the proof:-

http://nccu.org.uk/History/NCCUhistorypart6a.htm

Dave

Originally posted by Coletti
Why would you doubt it? He posted the game. And it was a simul, so Kasparov was playing many others at the same time. Under the circumstances, it's not so remarkable. Certainly not enough to accuse someone of lying. I think someone else at RHP beat Seirawan once.

I doubt Tebb was expecting to win either, just give Kasparov a run for his money.

Originally posted by David Tebb
I can understand why some people are sceptical, but I promise that I did beat Kasparov, and here's the proof:-

http://nccu.org.uk/History/NCCUhistorypart6a.htm

Dave

You are just lucky his forum avatar didn't jump out and do to you what Neo is doing to the agents in his profile picture...

😉

P-

Originally posted by The Slow Pawn
I just like to add that it is remarkable to have beaten Kasparov (regardless of it being at a simul) ...

I have once played a Simul against P. Leko and he wiped me out. Not saying that I'm the one to measure oneself against but indicating here how hard it is to beat people of that class... Once again, well done David


Regards

The Slow Pawn

Originally posted by The King of Queens
after checking out the website david tebb posted before i see that he really did beat casparov. sorry for doubting🙂

Originally posted by Varg
Are you the same person as The Sum of All fears?

actually, i happened also to beat Kasparov in a simultaneous exhibition last year, he was not pleased and said it was a sequence he had never seen before but he would certainly use it in his next game against Kramnik. Here is the game:

venue😕aint Trinian's School Assemby Hall
date: april 1st 2003
martinbeaver (white) 1101 vs Kasparov (black) 2845

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 d6 4. Nc3 Bg4 5. h3 Bh5; 6. Nxe5! Bxd1; 7. Bxf7+ Ke7 8. Nd5+ Mate!

Originally posted by martinbeaver
actually, i happened also to beat Kasparov in a simultaneous exhibition last year, he was not pleased and said it was a sequence he had never seen before but he would certainly use it in his next game against Kramnik. Here is the game:

venue😕aint Trinian's School Assemby Hall
date: april 1st 2003
martinbeaver (white) 1101 vs Kasparov (black) 2845 ...[text shortened]... e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 d6 4. Nc3 Bg4 5. h3 Bh5; 6. Nxe5! Bxd1; 7. Bxf7+ Ke7 8. Nd5+ Mate!

Originally posted by martinbeaver
actually, i happened also to beat Kasparov in a simultaneous exhibition last year, he was not pleased and said it was a sequence he had never seen before but he would certainly use it in his next game against Kramnik. Here is the game:

venue😕aint Trinian's School Assemby Hall
date: april 1st 2003
martinbeaver (white) 1101 vs Kasparov (black) 2845 ...[text shortened]... e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 d6 4. Nc3 Bg4 5. h3 Bh5; 6. Nxe5! Bxd1; 7. Bxf7+ Ke7 8. Nd5+ Mate!

Am i the only one who thinks that date is a bit suspicious?😉

Originally posted by tejo
Am i the only one who thinks that date is a bit suspicious?😉

I hate April Fools Day man...I know it's today, but yet I always get caught! 😀