Go back
discussion on various e4 defenses...

discussion on various e4 defenses...

Only Chess

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by paultopia
hmm... good point. well... lets see. as white, I usually play the king's gambit. as black against d4, I usually play the albin. Give you any kind of idea what kind of player I am? :-) Problem is, there don't seem to BE any real solid attacking openings, that aren't scary like the sicilian, as black against d4... :-)
Play 1...e5 and if your opponents play into the Spanish, use either the Schliemann (3...f5) or the Steinitz variation with ...f5 (can't recall what this is called - Siesta variation maybe?). Both are sounder than the Albin 😉 More importantly, they are fairly rare and push play onto Black's terms.

Vote Up
Vote Down

why not try the PIRC?????????
I can't believe no one mentioned it!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Everything is sounder than the Albin 🙄

The problem with the pirc is that its a little scary to see all those people walking around with copies of "Pirc Alert" under their arms at all times... makes me feel just a weee bit outbooked...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Pirc is the solid and comparatively easy to play. But it is not for everybody taste. Black player has good counter-attacking chances, but should be ready to spend some time in defensive stand. May not be very appealing for the *wild attacker*😀

Vote Up
Vote Down

Half the people you play won't know the theory in the opening you choose.
Half the people who do know the theory, won't remember it during the game.
Half the people who do remember it, won't be able to play the positions that arise anyway.
Half the people who do recall the theory, and can play the resulting positions, will blunder several times during the rest of the game no matter what.
And the remaining 3 players in every hundred games would probably have beaten you anyway.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Osse
Half the people you play won't know the theory in the opening you choose.
Half the people who do know the theory, won't remember it during the game.
Half the people who do remember it, won't be able to play the positions that arise anyway.
Half the people who do recall the theory, and can play the resulting positions, will blunder several times during the ...[text shortened]... t.
And the remaining 3 players in every hundred games would probably have beaten you anyway.
Well said!:-)

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by paultopia
hmm... good point. well... lets see. as white, I usually play the king's gambit. as black against d4, I usually play the albin. Give you any kind of idea what kind of player I am? :-) Problem is, there don't seem to BE any real solid attacking openings, that aren't scary like the sicilian, as black against d4... Marshall seemed to make the Petrof ...[text shortened]... e. And the Alkehine... just seems twisted. Confuse 'em early, confuse 'em often, I say. :-)
I do believe the Marshall Attack is on the black side of the Ruy Lopez. The Schliemann Attack is another good choice. Almost all attacking openings have alot of theory because of the long forcing variation and/or the sharp, tactical ones. 😀