Go back
English Tal banned

English Tal banned

Only Chess

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Jie
You recently made a claim about non-native English speakers being prone to cheating or something similar. Care to tell us more with English Tal's ban? What is English Tal's OTB rating?
Well, all I can say is that he must have got sick of being cheated by foreigners and decided to fight fire with fire - his rating was probably around the 2100 level in real life, and most players of that level can reach 2200+ in correspondance.

What I will say, in his defence, is that I believe he played fairly against me and was not using any engines.
These are the games:
Game 5436067
Game 5436033

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Tyrannosauruschex
Wow, I didnt see that one coming - I even respecfully resigned a game against him recently because I was certain he was a human.

Although, we did analyse a game in the forums where he got a 100% engine matchup - that sort of thing is a bit of a giveaway.

With this news, I think I am probably the only player left in the championships who will survive.
How sure can we be that he's, indeed, guilty of cheating? Perhaps the mods made a mistake. And he can't even defend himself once banned. The whole process seems un-democratic.
I'm not convinced. Game 4080882

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Tyrannosauruschex
Well, all I can say is that he must have got sick of being cheated by foreigners and decided to fight fire with fire
But of course! Those evil foreigners made him do it! 🙄

5 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

User 20483 made him do it!

edits: thanks DT 🙂

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by infomast
How sure can we be that he's, indeed, guilty of cheating? Perhaps the mods made a mistake. And he can't even defend himself once banned. The whole process seems un-democratic.
I'm not convinced. Game 4080882
The evidence suggests that he only cheated against certain opponents - he was a good enough player to have a chance of winning the rest of his games, and I believe he played those fairly.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Katastroof
Player 20483 made him do it!

edits: How do I link to a user?
User 20483

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Katastroof
Player 20483 made him do it!

edits: How do I link to a user?
Use square brackets: (uid)20483(/uid)

User 20483

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by infomast
The whole process seems un-democratic.
When did this site become a democracy?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by paulbuchmanfromfics
Here is the game Game 5429609.

The only "game" in this variation for black was a test line of the author of my book versus Chessmaster 4000.

The author won that game.
English Tal found a crucial improvement and busted me. 🙂

I never considered myself 2200 strength, so I just thought it was a regular beatdown.

It may in fact be. I haven't really analyzed it that much.
How could you not see move #17 Nd4c2+ ??

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Gatecrasher
No thanks. Who would want to drink from that poison'd chalice?
At this rate I may still end up being the 2007 champion yet. Fingers crossed.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Amsterdamn
How could you not see move #17 Nd4c2+ ??
Of course he saw it, it was a sacrifice. White sacced his rook to get two pieces (black squared bishop and other rook) quickly into the attack. Unfortunately Black was so much material up he could afford to give away his queen for a rook and still be up.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Tyrannosauruschex
Well, all I can say is that he must have got sick of being cheated by foreigners and decided to fight fire with fire - his rating was probably around the 2100 level in real life, and most players of that level can reach 2200+ in correspondance.

What I will say, in his defence, is that I believe he played fairly against me and was not using any engines.
These are the games:
Game 5436067
Game 5436033
I wonder what insults you would have had for English Tal were he "a foreigner". Send me a p.m. of your name and I can check whether you are in the leaked extremist party list doing the rounds on the internet. We are not talking about one or two games where he had 100% Fritz matchup. His engine was good enough to win the site championship.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Amsterdamn
How could you not see move #17 Nd4c2+ ??
I said he improved on Monson-Chessmaster 4000.
Here are some of the author's annotations to that game
14. ... b5 !?
15. Nh3!
17.Be3! (Still "theory"😉
18. ... Nxa1 ?
19.Re1 !!

The Chessmaster played 19. ... d6

19. ... Bb7 is a significant improvement and brings the whole line into question. (It also makes me question some of the NM's analysis in the book. He did do a great job, considering that the book covers every single variation.)

Here is a variation which I ended up transposing into, if I'm not mistaken.
19.Bc5+? Kg8 20.Re1 Bb7! 21.Re7 Qf8 22.Rxd7 Qf6! advantage to black.

I haven't used the Belgrade as much (if at all) since this game.
Two of the author's other moves

15.Bd3!? or 15.Be3!? "interesting" may be the way to go, although they too don't look that great.

Is this the bust to the 13. Bc4 variation?

If so, there is always 13.Qg3 ?! or 13.Kd1 !? (they too may have their difficulties.)

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Squelchbelch
ET gone but yet The Untouchable remains...
What has User 235866 done wrong 😛

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Jie
I wonder what insults you would have had for English Tal were he "a foreigner". Send me a p.m. of your name and I can check whether you are in the leaked extremist party list doing the rounds on the internet. We are not talking about one or two games where he had 100% Fritz matchup. His engine was good enough to win the site championship.
His "name" is on his profile page.

However his sign off is incorrect!!

It should be

By Queen...
By Rook...
By Pawn...
Bye Bye!

and not

By pawn...
By Rook...
By Queen...
Bye Bye!