Originally posted by RJHinds
Since there were a couple people wondering how we reached the posted position, I decided to show everyone that I am not such a bad guy and take the trouble to type the game out to that point. I just hope I did not mess up and have to keep editing it until I get the board to appear.
White - Benjamin Caiello
Black - RJHinds
[pgn]
1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. N ...[text shortened]... Rf3 Ba6
32. Rg3 Qg8 33. Kf2 {this is the postion where I asked you to find my best move} [/pgn]
Thanks for posting the game. What is unique about it is that, as I suspected, both players ended up playing on the "wrong" side of the board.
White clearly should have focused on the queenside, with the b6 knight and the pawn on c5. 16. f4 is useful to stall black's possible counterplay on the other wing, but the rook lift 18. Rf3 is completely uncalled for. White should connect his rooks and prepare the b4 advance, with a clear advantage. His knights work much better than your bishops because of the closed position.
Since there never was anything for white on the queenside, black had nothing to fear in the middlegame. You had a comfortable game until 25... b5, which weakened your position a lot. After that, white had the opportunity to consolidate his advantage with 26. Ndc5 Bxc5 27. Nxc5 followed by 28. b3. He should then shift gears and bring his rook and queen back to the queenside - which they should never have left in the first place.I could see white winning that one rather comfortably. Instead, he chose to overcommit on a plan that was wrong to begin with.
It's a shame you didn't get the opportunity to punish him for his artificial plan over the board. 33... Bc4 would have been a delightful move to play.