1. Standard memberhunterknox
    Hopeless romantic
    The sticks
    Joined
    01 Oct '06
    Moves
    41291
    17 Nov '12 00:421 edit
    Seeing as my opponent's too modest to post this, behold the fork to end all forks - every major piece and the king...



    Anyone got a better one than that?
  2. Subscriber64squaresofpain
    The drunk knight
    Stuck on g1
    Joined
    02 Sep '12
    Moves
    59226
    17 Nov '12 03:00
    All major pieces plus the king lol, i dont think anyone can do better than that
  3. Joined
    24 Aug '07
    Moves
    48477
    17 Nov '12 03:26
    Your thread title setup so many punchlines! 🙂
  4. Joined
    27 Apr '07
    Moves
    119111
    17 Nov '12 03:39
    Nice. Not to take anything away from your opponent's move, but he could have played 25 N e6 and they your dark squared bishop would have been forked as well!
  5. Standard membervivify
    rain
    Joined
    08 Mar '11
    Moves
    12351
    17 Nov '12 04:271 edit
    Wow, four major pieces, plus a pawn. It's like a fork peacock.
  6. Standard memberSwissGambit
    Caninus Interruptus
    2014.05.01
    Joined
    11 Apr '07
    Moves
    92274
    17 Nov '12 06:37
    Originally posted by hunterknox
    Seeing as my opponent's too modest to post this, behold the fork to end all forks - every major piece and the king...

    [pgn][Event "August 2012 Banded Duel 1700-1750"] [Site "http://www.redhotpawn.com"] [Date "2012.10.24"] [EndDate "2012.11.15"] [Round "3"] [White "jayo"] [Black "hunterknox"] [WhiteRating "1656"] [BlackRating "1667"] [WhiteElo "1656"] [ ...[text shortened]... h!} Kg7h6 28. Ne6xc7 1-0[/pgn]

    Anyone got a better one than that?
    Just imagine if the f2 wasn't there and you could have answered NxQ with ...Bg5+!! 🙂
  7. Standard memberSwissGambit
    Caninus Interruptus
    2014.05.01
    Joined
    11 Apr '07
    Moves
    92274
    17 Nov '12 07:01
    Originally posted by paulbuchmanfromfics
    Your thread title setup so many punchlines! 🙂
    Top Ten reasons I declined to Fork You:

    10) You never let me do it from the 8th rank.
    9) Last time I did, my Knight came back with spots.
    8) I was afraid my Bishop would get trapped.
    7) Don't want to have to make any more pawn support payments.
    6) You'll just complain that a black Knight would have been taller.
    5) If I play one blitz game, you'll expect a whole tournament.
    4) My pawn doesn't have any lead in it (it fell out, honestly, it did)
    3) Recently polished the Bishop and it's not quite ready for a new game.
    2) Rumor has it that you'll spread your Rooks for anyone.

    And finally... the NUMBER ONE reason I declined to fork you:

    *drum roll*

    1) I couldn't get my pawn to promote.
  8. Joined
    24 Aug '07
    Moves
    48477
    17 Nov '12 08:29
    Originally posted by SwissGambit
    Top Ten reasons I declined to Fork You:

    10) You never let me do it from the 8th rank.
    9) Last time I did, my Knight came back with spots.
    8) I was afraid my Bishop would get trapped.
    7) Don't want to have to make any more pawn support payments.
    6) You'll just complain that a black Knight would have been taller.
    5) If I play one blitz game, ...[text shortened]... NE reason I declined to fork you:

    *drum roll*

    1) I couldn't get my pawn to promote.
    LOL ...
    With all these reasons, I guess he'll just have to go fork himself!
  9. Standard memberchessicle
    The Chessicle
    Scotland?
    Joined
    19 Feb '05
    Moves
    177133
    17 Nov '12 13:40
    Originally posted by SmittyTime
    Nice. Not to take anything away from your opponent's move, but he could have played 25 N e6 and they your dark squared bishop would have been forked as well!
    Except the knight was pinned to the king until the bishop took the rook on h4 - which was on h4 for that reason and that reason alone!
  10. Standard memberMarinkatomb
    wotagr8game
    tbc
    Joined
    18 Feb '04
    Moves
    61941
    17 Nov '12 16:47
    Haha, that's a whopper! 😀
  11. Standard memberchessicle
    The Chessicle
    Scotland?
    Joined
    19 Feb '05
    Moves
    177133
    17 Nov '12 17:03
    I'd forgotten this, because it was a long time ago, but I've done the same thing, on the same square!

  12. Standard membervivify
    rain
    Joined
    08 Mar '11
    Moves
    12351
    17 Nov '12 17:07
    Why is it that in both games posted, the one who's forked waits until after the queen is captured to resign? As if that's not the obvious move?
  13. Standard memberMarinkatomb
    wotagr8game
    tbc
    Joined
    18 Feb '04
    Moves
    61941
    17 Nov '12 17:17
    Originally posted by vivify
    Why is it that in both games posted, the one who's forked waits until after the queen is captured to resign? As if that's not the obvious move?
    Perhaps to say gg?
  14. Standard membervivify
    rain
    Joined
    08 Mar '11
    Moves
    12351
    17 Nov '12 18:25
    Originally posted by Marinkatomb
    Perhaps to say gg?
    Ah, true. Sportsman-like conduct does exist.
  15. Standard memberhunterknox
    Hopeless romantic
    The sticks
    Joined
    01 Oct '06
    Moves
    41291
    17 Nov '12 19:05
    Originally posted by vivify
    Why is it that in both games posted, the one who's forked waits until after the queen is captured to resign? As if that's not the obvious move?
    Pick one...

    1) a neat move or combo deserves to be played out.
    2) As SwissGambit points out I had the odd latent threats going and was still trying to work out if I could make any of them work. From that position if black could find a way to getting two pieces for the queen, drop both on the open files and coordinate both bishops then all is not lost.
    3) the gg thing

    Chessicle: interesting game, now please teach me how to forget!
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree