Originally posted by Lord of Destructionactully I think IronMan31 is the best player here! He is moving up!
Do you think it is a feasible idea on RHP for the four top players to play each other in a tournament every three months?
What do you all think? Pros and cons
LoD
P.S. Looks like IronMan31 is moving up the ranks quickly as well.
Originally posted by gambit3That is because IronMan31 is actully Bobby Fischer!
A direct answer is yes. Red Hot Pawn could have a Red Hot Pawn championship if they wanted to. P.S. Lets wait and see how well IronMan's queen plays vs the 2'000 pluss rated players. Best player I ever saw play is Ast68 on another e mail server. I never saw his king in trouble.
Game 495987 against LittleBear (2085), looks very interesting, but I think White (LB) is a little better...
Olav
Originally posted by LivingLegendJust a little?!
Game 495987 against LittleBear (2085), looks very interesting, but I think White (LB) is a little better...
Olav
Originally posted by Pulsatillago to his profile - find the dips in his graph, get your mouse in the right spot - just before the dip - click your button linking to the loss that caused the dip.
I've been wading through LittleBears game trying to see who he has lost to, anyone know?
then come to a logical conclusion defining the four top players - and their pecking order:
Game 241547
Game 338211
Game 344956
there is also another: Game 198424
Originally posted by Lord of DestructionAre you suggesting that the top four players should be forced to play each other in a tournament every 3 months - why? I'm not sure they'll be too keen on that - would you want to be forced to take part in a tournament? 🙄
Do you think it is a feasible idea on RHP for the four top players to play each other in a tournament every three months?
Originally posted by LivingLegendi am enjoying Ironman v bbarr at the moment.
Game 495987 against LittleBear (2085), looks very interesting, but I think White (LB) is a little better...
Olav
daniel