Go back
Garry Kasparov uses The A.R.B Chess System (1983) and Crushes!!! IBM Deep Blue (1997)

Garry Kasparov uses The A.R.B Chess System (1983) and Crushes!!! IBM Deep Blue (1997)

Only Chess

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

Garry Kasparov uses The A.R.B Chess System (1983) and Crushes!!! IBM Deep Blue (1997)



1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down
Vote Up
Vote Down

@TARBCS said
Garry Kasparov uses The A.R.B Chess System (1983) and Crushes!!! IBM Deep Blue (1997)

youtube.com/watch?v=WRwDO9P_KWM

[pgn][Event "casual correspondence game"]
[Site "https://lichess.org/gdEj47Dv"]
[Date "2023.01.31"]
[Round "-"]
[White "lichess AI level 8"]
[Black "TherealARB"]
[Result "0-1"]
[GameId "gdEj47Dv"]
[UTCDate "2023.01.31"]
[UTCTime "11:40:15"]
[Whi ...[text shortened]... b2 69. Ke3 Ba2 70. Kf2 Bb1 71. Bc4 Bg6 72. Bd3 Bxd3 73. Kf3 b1=Q 74. Ke3 Qf1 75. Kd2 Qae1# 0-1[/pgn]
Is this a promotion?
You haven't played a game of chess for 15 months

Vote Up
Vote Down

@AlanTal
If it is then it worked because you replied! 🙂

And how do you know I have not played a game of chess for 15 months ? 🙂

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@TARBCS said
@AlanTal
If it is then it worked because you replied! 🙂

And how do you know I have not played a game of chess for 15 months ? 🙂
It says in your profile:
Last move 08 Apr 25

and of course @Alan Tal meant: on the site
You could play against the big guys here with your system and then comment on the game, people would like that.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@Ponderable

I play enough on the lichess.org site when I feel like it,but most games are for fun when I have drunk beer 🙂 TARBCS was invented only for beating Chess engines rated 3000+ elo Not! Humans,the human wins shows it can win when Humans panic,or when I get my moments of brilliance which seems to be less these days! 🙁

Vote Up
Vote Down

@TARBCS said
@Ponderable

I play enough on the lichess.org site when I feel like it,but most games are for fun when I have drunk beer 🙂 TARBCS was invented only for beating Chess engines rated 3000+ elo Not! Humans,the human wins shows it can win when Humans panic,or when I get my moments of brilliance which seems to be less these days! 🙁
So if you beat someone with your system you can be moderatly sure they use a computer?

Vote Up
Vote Down

@Ponderable
Not really if they use a Computer the Anti-Computer methods normally get's them banned! So their games are void and it's never recorded that I played them.
The problem at the moment is that Stockfish 18 is now so advanced that it has become a whole new problem! for the first time ever against TARBCS it castles Queen side! at (180+) Seconds per move,maybe less on some Computers? (you are the first to have heard about this!) 🙂 this has never happened before by any Chess engine,so watch this space for an update I hope?

Vote Up
Vote Down

@TARBCS said
Garry Kasparov uses The A.R.B Chess System (1983) and Crushes!!! IBM Deep Blue (1997)

youtube.com/watch?v=WRwDO9P_KWM

[pgn][Event "casual correspondence game"]
[Site "https://lichess.org/gdEj47Dv"]
[Date "2023.01.31"]
[Round "-"]
[White "lichess AI level 8"]
[Black "TherealARB"]
[Result "0-1"]
[GameId "gdEj47Dv"]
[UTCDate "2023.01.31"]
[UTCTime "11:40:15"]
[Whi ...[text shortened]... b2 69. Ke3 Ba2 70. Kf2 Bb1 71. Bc4 Bg6 72. Bd3 Bxd3 73. Kf3 b1=Q 74. Ke3 Qf1 75. Kd2 Qae1# 0-1[/pgn]
AI:
ARB system is generally considered a non-legitimate or scam 'system' rather than a recognised, free piece of software. It has been dismissed by users as 'Applied Random B******t' and a 'phony system' to win, with no reputable source indicating it is a legitimate, free resource.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@AlanTal

First of all The A.R.B Chess System is not a piece of Software ,it is a way of playing Chess to defeat Chess engines rated 3000+ elo (This is very important! because the system relies on optimum moves played) weaker Chess engines can play random moves with no logic!
And the infamous Im/Gm? Pfren is the fool that quoted 'Applied Random B******t' and a 'phony system' to win

Below explains all 🙂

The A.R.B. (Applied Random Bull????) Chess System, promoted by a user known as "TherealARB" or "Anthony," has countered the "random bull????" label originally coined by International Master Panayotis Frendzas (Pfren) through several key arguments and practical demonstrations.
The reasons why the system's proponents claim Pfren was incorrect include:
Consistent Wins Against Elite Engines: Proponents argue that a system cannot be "random nonsense" if it consistently defeats top-tier engines like Stockfish 17 (rated over 3600 Elo) in live play. Proponents claim hundreds of such wins exist.
Exploitation of Engine "Blind Spots": The system uses specialized, passive-looking structures that reportedly exploit evaluation weaknesses in Neural Network Engines (NNUE). These engines sometimes struggle to break down its rigid pawn structures, eventually overcommitting or "getting bored" into a shuffling phase.
Live Verification: By playing games live against 2000+ Elo humans and the latest computer versions, proponents argue they eliminate the possibility of external assistance, proving the system's strategic framework is viable on its own.
Statistical Improbability: Proponents claim that if the moves were truly random, it would be mathematically impossible to maintain a winning record against the most powerful AI in history.
Strategic Harmony: While engines excel at tactical depth, the A.R.B. system focuses on a "deep positional squeeze" and "strategic harmony" that proponents claim outclasses traditional GM theory in the engine era.


pfren abandoned us...

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-com-community/pfren-abandoned-us-56945522