4 edits
I like your pawn sac attitudde but I fear it's too well known.
Try the French Wing Gambit.
This PGN could not be parsed.
[1. e4 e6 2. Nf3 d5 3. e5 c5 4. b4 cxb4 5. d4
[1. e4 e6 2. Nf3 d5 3. e5 c5 4. b4 cxb4 5. d4
Here is a game I had with it on here a few weeks ago.
Note how I got it from a Sicilian. Look out for transpositions
from one opening into another.
'In-betweener' lesson part 2.
He can play the 'in-betweener' on move 14.
here he played 14...Bxh4
Allowing me to play 15.Qh6. But if he had stopped on g5. 14...Bg5
I move my Queen he can then take the Knight and I have no Qh6.
I gambled he would not see it - good chess this. ( 😉 )
He was going for a stalemate at the end. I stop that by giving
back the Queen.
Originally posted by greenpawn34Excellent unnecessary queen sac 🙂
I like your pawn sac attitudde but I fear it's too well known.
Try the French Wing Gambit.
[pgn]
[1. e4 e6 2. Nf3 d5 3. e5 c5 4. b4 cxb4 5. d4[/pgn]
Here is a game I had with it on here a few weeks ago.
Note how I got it from a Sicilian. Look out for transpositions
from one opening into another.
'In-betweener' lesson part 2.
He can play ...[text shortened]... xd1 Ba4+ 32. Rxa4+ Kb5 33. Rb4+ Ka5 34. Qxa6+ Rxa6 35. Nb7#[/pgn]
The perfect end to a perfect game.
In 50 years time when computers have killed off chess, the last ever
chess book to be written will have a chapter on brilliant Queen
sacrifices made by humans.
Paulsen-Morphy 1857, Byrne-Fischer 1956 and greenpawn - richjohnson 2009.
Here is the Morphy game to compare with mine.
Paulsen - Morphy, New York 1857