09 Aug '08 20:19>1 edit
Originally posted by ivan2908in the end it naturally is. but a whole lot of things get masked by it. like for example, when I've just learned how to mate with Q vs R. it probably won't show as a single rating point right now. but when I'll some day face it in a game, I can destroy my opponent blitz speed. it makes me a better player, without showing up in my rating.
Me too but isn't the rating indicator of mastered stuff and chess understanding ? I do not play because of rating per se but how would you otherwise track your progress if not with statistical rating points ?
eventually those little things will accumulate, reach a critical mass, and I'll hit a jump in rating level. but it's more a side-effect as far as I'm concerned. I'm more interested in learning those specific little things than in the possible rating bump.
I'm a lot better player now than I was a year ago, but my rating is almost unchanged. the reason why my rating is not rising, is that I stopped heavy tactics training back then. I knew that would happen, and never expected anything else. but meanwhile I've come a long way in all other areas, mainly endgame & openings. the holes which I need to fill before I can really survive with the bigger dogs.