29 Mar '09 07:24>
User 403285
If you have enough proofs that someone cheats, please send feedback to the admins - it works!!
If you have enough proofs that someone cheats, please send feedback to the admins - it works!!
Originally posted by eladyHow long from feedback to ban ??
User 403285
If you have enough proofs that someone cheats, please send feedback to the admins - it works!!
Originally posted by GarnothIt happens when you play at work :'(
Cheating is indeed horrible behaviour, as is just leaving a 1 min blitz game where your are stand worse with less time than your opponent (but you're not losing) without even saying gg or resigning 😉
[pgn][Event "RHP Blitz rated"] [Site "www.redhotpawn.com"] [Date "2009.3.29"] [Round "?"] [White "elady"] [Black "Garnoth"] [Result "0-1"] 1. e2-e4 c7-c6 ...[text shortened]... Ng8-e7 8. O-O a7-a6 9. Bb5-e2 Ne7-f5 10. a2-a3 Qd8-c7 11. Bc1-e3 Bc5xe3 0-1[/pgn]
Originally posted by adramforallTry to analize their games, send the results to the admins and don't give up - i already "catched" 4 cheaters.
What do you mean a couple 😛
There are a few that have been reported but still here months after the event.
Annoying but the only good thing is I will never play them.
Originally posted by adramforallHi
What do you mean a couple 😛
There are a few that have been reported but still here months after the event.
Annoying but the only good thing is I will never play them.
Originally posted by greenpawn34I completely disagree with this. It's not like they're being hanged or sent to prison for ten years, they're just being booted from an online chess site. I'd be happy with a system with, say, 5% false positives.
Better 99 cheats remain than one innocent good player is given the boot.
Originally posted by eladyI sent in detailed analysis with out of book results
User 403285
If you have enough proofs that someone cheats, please send feedback to the admins - it works!!
Originally posted by Fat LadyHi Mate,
I completely disagree with this. It's not like they're being hanged or sent to prison for ten years, they're just being booted from an online chess site. I'd be happy with a system with, say, 5% false positives.
Originally posted by greenpawn34I don't see the need to be honest.
...[b]Squelch: Since you submitted that guy will have played more
games v higher and better players - run his numbers again,
I'd expect higher results, then submit another FPT...[/b]